
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
8th Grader Arrested, Suspended for NRA ‘Protect Your Right’ T-Shirt With Image of Gun
Syria tentatively accepts surrender of alleged chemical weapons arsenal
ESM Permanent Bailout Fund Prepares for Prime Time
Private prisons contribute thousands to Oklahoma political campaigns
Bitcoin among virtual currencies targeted in US crackdown on tax evasion
For GOP mega-donors, a convention of their own
Sweden aims to be cashless society
States Squeezing Amazon Marketplace Sellers For Back Sales Taxes
Police officer gets year in jail for conning immigrants out of $13,000
Bank Advisor: 'Should Your Bank Do Business With Bitcoin?'
U.S. would welcome Modi as India leader despite past visa ban
Alabama Gov. orders investigation after DNA, blood samples collected at roadblocks
San Mateo County deputy accused of child sex abuse
Jittery Spaniards Seek Safety in Bitcoins
The Oil Crash Has Caused a $1.3 Trillion Wipeout