
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Expat exodus from Spain as new tax law takes effect
US citing security to censor more public records
Raul Castro promises end of an era in Cuba as he steps down as country’s president
JPMorgan: China's Potential Capital Outflows 'Practically Boundless'
16 Year Old Questioned By FBI for Supporting Ron Paul
Ron Paul slams US on Crimea crisis: Russia sanctions 'an act of war'
Tax havens explained: How the rich hide money
Daniel Ellsberg: Snowden made the right call when he fled the U.S.
Family of bystander killed during high-speed police chase sues police
Carlyle Jumps Into Niche Space: Trailer Parks
Google reports ‘steady increase’ in gov’t requests for user data
NJ: Text Recipients Can Be Held Liable In Texting-And-Driving Accidents
Valedictorian fights for diploma after using the word 'hell' in graduation speech
Mint: U.S. bullion coin demand still at 'unprecedented' levels
Father Spends 11 Months In Jail, Sues LAPD for Murder Framing