
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Pa. Man Barters With Bacon for Cross-Country Trip
Ex-Port Authority Official Says Christie Knew About Lane Closings
Rwandan woman stripped of U.S. citizenship after lying about role in genocide
IBM exec: Bitcoin 'technological cat is out of the bag'
Police corporal jailed after assaulting, illegally arresting pedestrian
Official wants E-cigarettes covered in school rules
West Point sergeant accused of filming naked female cadets without their consent
In Newtown, Gun Permits Surge After Shooting
Alan Greenspan on Dow Jones All-Time High: No Irrational Exuberance Here
Austrian presidential election result overturned
Late Marc Rich’s Swiss mansions for sale
Iraq unearths 1,400-year-old gold coins
Calgary student, 13, reprimanded for defending his classmate against a knife-wielding bully
ICE whistleblower gets a visit from Homeland Security goons during TV interview
German court rules that ECB's 2012 bond-buying plan is legal