“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Nasty Gal: From eBay To Multimillion-Dollar Company In Seven Years
Over half of China's new bitcoin traders are women
Hacker finds flaw in hotel locks, can ruin your vacation with $50 DIY gadget
Microsoft and Google to sue over U.S. surveillance requests
Union's Pay Negotiations Play Big Role In Protests Over ‘Google Buses’
Qualcomm cuts workforce by 15% as stock turns down
Governments turn tables by suing public records requesters
Thanks shallot! Indian police foil onion heist
Ecuador Offers to Buy Back Its Defaulted Bonds -- With a 50% Haircut
China Freezes IPOs in Attempt to Stem Stock Market Bleeding
Israel facing ‘increasing number of cyber attacks’
Human rights group demands halt to live ammo use in Egypt
Should Bales Bail?
Swiss Banking: Still Under Attack By Bankrupt Governments
American teenager designs compact nuclear reactor