
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Army Suicides This Year Exceed 2012 Combat Deaths in Afghanistan
Fed Up With Bitcoin? Here's How To Start Your Own Currency
Russia diverts pension savings to plug budget hole for second year
GOP Mogul Behind Drug Rehab 'Torture' Centers Bankrolling Opposition to Pot Legalization
U.S. Will Simulate a Knockout Blow of Electric Power Grid This November
Paulson, Soros Add Gold as Price Declines Most Since 2008
France vows to defend jobs as GE bids for bailed-out energy company
3 NSA veterans speak out on whistle-blower: We told you so
If Apple Did What eBay Just Did, They'd Have A $44 Billion Tax Bill
Judge Napolitano: How to get fired from Fox Business in under 5 minutes [2012]
VTA can keep transit cardholders' personal data for seven years [2012]
UK viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail
Japan’s Debt Exceeds 1 Quadrillion Yen as Abe Mulls Tax Rise
Pentagon Needs Battle Plan for Troop-Suicide Threat
Larry Kotlikoff: Detroit Today, Washington Tomorrow