
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
State seizes 11-year-old, arrests his mother for defending medical marijuana
China and Russia Lay Foundation for Massive Economic Cooperation
As Bitcoin Surges, Here's How It Compares to Gold
Spain's Corruption Capital: Trial Highlights Extent of Building Boom Sleaze
Security-Enhanced Android: NSA Edition
Danish police prosecute 1,000 youngsters for sharing viral sex video
Indian rupee falls further amid Fed stimulus concerns
Google’s Sergey Brin bankrolled world’s first synthetic beef hamburger ‘for animal welfare reasons’
Obama Flashback: "We Refused to Let Detroit Go Bankrupt"
Hospitals bribed by NHS to put patients on pathway to death
Aussies start paying for beers in Bitcoin
U.S. to deliver F-16 fighters to Egypt despite recent upheaval
Harper government kills controversial Canadian Internet surveillance bill
German Euro-Skeptic Party Gaining Ground
McCain: $1 coin could lead to bigger tips for strippers