
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Top Federal Reserve economist slams 'incoherent' European Central Bank
For GOP mega-donors, a convention of their own
NSA deeply involved in drone strikes against terror suspects
With $114 million, Obama just outraises Romney in August
U.S. warns Egypt of return to ‘bad old days’ of Mubarak
Snapchat's young users snap up stock — and want more IPOs
NYT: 'Close the N.S.A.’s Back Doors'
Jim Rogers: Gold Mining Stocks Face Two Major Headwinds
Finland Should Never Have Joined Euro, Foreign Minister Says
Craigslist has cost U.S. newspapers $5 billion
The Members Of Romney's Campaign Who Work For Fox
LAPD takes aim at wave of Asian ‘maternity tourists’
Trump’s Electronics Ban Is Ineffective, Says International Air Transport Association Chief
Body cam shows dad had hands up when cops killed his 6-year-old son
Perseus, Atlas Launch Global High-Frequency Bitcoin Trading Platform