“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Saudi Arabia may go broke before the US oil industry buckles
Trouble on U.S. farms as growers seek workers and crops rot
Young Turks seek greater liberty, not revolution
While feds double down on marijuana prohibition, businesses stop bothering
Angola approves laws to open stock exchange, debt markets
Detroit Cops Arrested For Robbing Drivers At Gunpoint
Germans donated only €165,489 Euros to reduce €2.1 trillion debt
Postal Service losses tripled to $16 billion from previous year
Police chief, police captain, firefighter sentenced for child sex offenses
U.S. Border Patrol Agent Executes Young Mexican Woman With Headshot
New Hampshire cop to plead guilty to sexually assaulting a teenager
China and Russia Lay Foundation for Massive Economic Cooperation
Tech start-ups fight Senate tax plan over stock option 'phantom income'
Will SoFi Take Sallie Mae's Best Customers?
Denmark to scrap world’s first fat tax