“The 2010 discovery of the Stuxnet cyberweapon, which used a thumb drive to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and spread among its computers, illustrated how one type of attack could work. Most at risk are paperless e-voting machines, which don’t print out any record of votes, meaning the electronically stored results could be altered without anyone knowing they had been changed. In a tight election, the result could be the difference between winning and losing. A Monitor analysis shows that four swing states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida – rely to varying degrees on paperless machines.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Dolce and Gabbana jailed over tax evasion
Croatian Swiss franc debtors demand central bank governor resign
GoCoin raises $550k for Bitcoin Payment Service
Google warns that govt is demanding more of your private data than ever
Why the Working Poor and Banks Are a Bad Match
Chicago cop whose home was raided is awarded $565,000 in damages
Florida housing market may get a boost from ‘boomerang buyers’
Gold Investors Seek Alpine Haven in Swiss Army Bunkers
NSA pushed 9/11 as key 'sound bite' to justify surveillance
US photojournalist recounts horror of captivity after escaping al-Qaeda in Syria
CIA agents training Syrian rebels since late 2012
Bernanke backpedals, says Federal Reserve stimulus still needed
Bitcoin Crash Spurs Race to Create New Exchanges
Convicted TSA Officer Reveals Secrets of Thefts at Airports
Navy wants drones stashed on the seafloor