“The 2010 discovery of the Stuxnet cyberweapon, which used a thumb drive to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and spread among its computers, illustrated how one type of attack could work. Most at risk are paperless e-voting machines, which don’t print out any record of votes, meaning the electronically stored results could be altered without anyone knowing they had been changed. In a tight election, the result could be the difference between winning and losing. A Monitor analysis shows that four swing states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida – rely to varying degrees on paperless machines.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
IRS head Lois Lerner invokes 5th Amendment but may be compelled to testify anyway
UK reviews home schooling amid fears children are being 'radicalised'
WWII Shipwreck Yields $38 Million Of Silver From Atlantic
Police take over food delivery run, bust recipient for marijuana
Swiss wildlife officer convicted of poaching 131 animals
U.S. Payroll Tax Will Be Higher in 2013
John Kerry, 1971: 'I Don't Think U.S. Can Apply Moralism Around The World'
Kyle Bass Tells 'Nominal' Stock Market Cheerleaders: Remember Zimbabwe
3D-Printed Gun's Blueprints Downloaded 100,000 Times In Two Days (With Some Help From Kim Dotcom)
'Every Person Is Afraid of the Drones': The Strikes' Effect on Life in Pakistan
Foodies Fight to Save Detroit With Job Hopes Pinned on Arugula
Peru dethrones Colombia as cocaine king
‘An attempt at vandalism’ ?
U.S. sends anti-missile destroyer near North Korean coast
Apple becomes most valuable company in history