“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: To the Class of 2015, Part 2
The $4 Trillion Money Printing Press
What If the U.S. Didn’t Have a Military Establishment?
Oligarchies Masquerading as Democracies
Government Spying Has Always Focused On Crushing Dissent … Not On Keeping Us Safe
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
A Shoe Tariff With a Big Footprint
Revisiting The '87 Crash
Obamachow: Is National Food Insurance The Next Big Idea?
The Financial Case for Borrowing Money Today
You Are an Anarchist. The Question Is How Often?
South Africa and Ending Apartheid: The Free-Market Road Not Taken
Why the Government Is Desperately Trying to Inflate a New Housing Bubble
Jacob G. Hornberger: The Evil of the National-Security State, Part 3
Ignore Saudi and Israeli Goading for Muscular U.S. Mideast Policy