“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
How the Iraq War Became a War on Christians
Ask James, Part II: How to Be a Millionaire, How To Be Ugly, How to Network, Back To School Reading ...
Privacy in the Face of NSA Abuse
The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return
James Bovard: Obama, NSA, Gulf of Tonkin, & Governing as Lying
Civil Forfeiture Of Cash: It Could Happen To You
When Homeland Security Theater goes Off-Script
Syria and Second Passports
Let’s Make America Free Again: We’re Walking a Dangerous Road
War Is a Certainty
Bitcoin Is Not Surging, 'Going Ballistic' Or 'Going On An Astronomical Tear'
Bitcoin: The People's Money with Roger Ver and Jeffrey Tucker
Is Nicotine Really Any Different Than Caffeine?
Ben Bernanke – Revisiting The Helicopter Speech
Is America Too Big?
