“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
Paying Lip Service to Liberty
A congressional speech on the centennial of the Expatriation Act of 1868
How the Paper Money Experiment Will End
Did the Election Save ObamaCare?
Anthony Gregory: Obama’s Persecution of Bradley Manning
A Commissarina Rises: Wendy J. Olson's Reign of Terror
My Journey in the World of Copyrights
From the Files of the Nineveh PD
Andrew Bacevich: How We Got Here
Hayek to Satoshi and Beyond
Happy Tax Freedom Day?
Why NSA Snooping Is Bigger Deal in Germany
Peter Schiff: The GDP Distractor
Substitutionary Justice In A Free Society
John Hussman: Judging the Future at a Speculative Peak
