“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
A Guide To Understanding the Middle East, Syria, The West and Oil
The “Social Contract” Is a Fraud; Anyone Enforcing It Is A Criminal
A CEO's-Eye View of ObamaCare
Burn your Obamacare card
Jeffrey Tucker: The Joys of Living
A Day in the Life of a Regulated Financial Professional
The Iraq War: 10 Years Later
Bitcoin: Internationalization's New Best Friend
Energy Manipulation
Bill Bonner: Never Never Land
Will IRS Find Your Small Foreign Bank Account?
Doug French: The Market Is Rigged
Is Your Portfolio Ready for this Coming Disaster?
Bill Bonner: Too Much of a Good Thing, Continued…
Michael Scheuer: The price of U.S. interventionism in Syria and Israel
