“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Is the U.S. Producing Democracies?
Ludwig von Mises: Come Back to Gold
The Grand Experiment: Offloading Risk onto the State
Inflation Has Not Cured Iceland’s Economic Woes
It’s a Sound-Money Alternative to the Dollar
Singapore: A Case of Libertarian Orientalism?
The Future of Countries
James Bovard: The FBI’s Forgotten Criminal Record
Henry Magee, John Quinn, and the "Right of Resistance"
"The Bank Was Saved, and the People Were Ruined."
How Life Finds a Way in the Regulatory State
Why the Poles keep coming: The British welfare trap
CITIZEN SAFETY ALERT: You Have The Right To Go Home To Your Family Too
Hunting for Foreign Real Estate Bargains
The morning after: When a government destroys its currency