“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
A Day in the Life of a Regulated Financial Professional
David Galland: Lessons from the Argentine
Thoughts Have Consequences
Ron Paul: Neo-Con War Addiction Threatens Our Future
The True Story Behind 300 and Sparta's "Super Soldiers"
Money Will Be Digital — But Will It Be Free?
The Creative Destruction of New York in 47 Seconds
Anthony Wile: Sit Silently ... as Bombs Burst in Air
The Police State Mindset in Our Public Schools
Do Korea “experts” know what they are talking about?
It's Happening Faster Than Even I Thought
Hong Kong Wrong [2006]
Thaddeus Russell: 'A Renegade History of the United States'
On Poisoned Ground: East Chicago’s legacy of lead pollution
How Bitcoin solved my startup's international banking problem
