
“What seems to be pretty much a given is that the DEA will not go after consumers. They simply don’t have the staff to do it. 99% of possession arrests are by state and local police — if they’re not doing it under the new law, then the feds can’t do much about it. So, as with medical marijuana, they’ll go after the big suppliers. That’s almost impossible to defend against — the government’s ability to seize property and the visibility of large suppliers makes it easy picking. So the smart thing would be to push for a lot of small suppliers — make it hard for the DEA to go after them and less of a loss if they do.”
Related posts:
A Rare Anomaly in the Gold Market
Bahrain, a Brutal U.S. Ally
Jacob Hornberger: Wrong Message in the Ulbricht Case
Life-Saving Third-World Remittances Smothered by Anti-Money-Laundering Laws
Housing, Diminishing Returns and Opportunity Cost
Historic Gold Crash. What To Expect Next [Bearish]
2009 Promise of Cheaper Health Care Has Morphed Into 2013 Price Hikes
The Minimum Wage Is Cruelest To Those Who Can't Find A Job
Dangerous Organizations of the National Security State
U.S. Officials Are Above the Law of Nations and Ordinary Laws
New dynamic in Iran's European ties
The “Moral Obscenity” of Washington’s Empire
The Absurdist, Tragicomic Narratives of Domestic Surveillance
Paul Craig Roberts: No Jobs For Americans
How much are social justice warriors costing their colleges?