“What seems to be pretty much a given is that the DEA will not go after consumers. They simply don’t have the staff to do it. 99% of possession arrests are by state and local police — if they’re not doing it under the new law, then the feds can’t do much about it. So, as with medical marijuana, they’ll go after the big suppliers. That’s almost impossible to defend against — the government’s ability to seize property and the visibility of large suppliers makes it easy picking. So the smart thing would be to push for a lot of small suppliers — make it hard for the DEA to go after them and less of a loss if they do.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Anthony Gregory: What Is the Threshold for Martial Law?
Paul Craig Roberts: Stasi In The White House
Jim Rogers: Need to abolish capital controls, cut public spending in India
Enhance Public Safety: Disarm the Police!
Celebrities Call to Ban Guns From Government
'King Would've Marched on Obama'
The Strange Tale of Swiss Banking – And What It Means for You
Judge Napolitano Weighs In On Effort To Change U.S. Tax Laws to Go After Offshore Tax Havens
Justifying the Unjustifiable: US Uses Past Crimes to Legalize Future Ones
Massive jump in people who renounced US citizenship last quarter
"State Control": What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About
Nothing Succeeds Like ‘Success’ - Justin Raimondo
Bill Bonner: The Housing Rebound Story Is a Fraud
Which Shade of Lipstick Looks Best on a Pig?
Dead Souls of a Cultural Revolution