“What seems to be pretty much a given is that the DEA will not go after consumers. They simply don’t have the staff to do it. 99% of possession arrests are by state and local police — if they’re not doing it under the new law, then the feds can’t do much about it. So, as with medical marijuana, they’ll go after the big suppliers. That’s almost impossible to defend against — the government’s ability to seize property and the visibility of large suppliers makes it easy picking. So the smart thing would be to push for a lot of small suppliers — make it hard for the DEA to go after them and less of a loss if they do.”
Related posts:
Michael Scheuer: Observing King Obama’s Syrian madness, II
Paul Craig Roberts: Pussy Riot, The Unfortunate Dupes of Amerikan Hegemony
Bill Bonner: My Very Own Argentine Welfare Program
Which Countries Can The NSA Whistleblower Escape To?
DNA's Trap for Investors: A Race to the Bottom
Detlev Schlichter: Forward Guidance? – Nonsense! Central bankers have no choice.
Bob Higgs: What the State Fears Most—Revelations of the Truth about the State
CNN Poll Finds 55% Support Marijuana Legalization
Despite panic, China’s regulation of Bitcoin leaves room for optimism
Doug Casey Predicts Day of Economic Reckoning Is Near
Martin Luther King and Lee Harvey Oswald
Nigel Farage: Collapsing The System & Enslaving People
Nigel Farage: This Is My Greatest Worry As We Head Into 2013
Obama's Hammer and the Progress of The Daily Bell
Boston Herald: Scandal-ridden FBI must be abolished