“For the USA, its ambitions have a new locus in Africa. These wars, as in Libya and Mali, have not been joined by this trio of imperialists because of terrorism threatening Europe or the U.S. This is, for one thing, about controlling African governments and enabling the extraction of wealth from resources in this region of Africa. It was Gaddafi’s (Libya’s) sympathy and outreach toward these regions and peoples that helped bring about his downfall. He stood in the way of western business interests, and his ideas for controlling the resources for Africans could not be abided by the western business interests and their allies in government.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130946.html
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Ron Paul: Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism
Let Our Debt Scrub Our Brains
Ron Paul: Billion-Dollar Ukraine Aid Bill Is a Bad Deal For All
If Chris Kyle Had Been a Muslim, We'd Call him an Extremist
U.S. Helping Iranians With Surveillance Circumvention Technologies
Ron Paul: You Cannot Negotiate With Iran?
China has much at risk but no reach in Middle East
Gold Crash 2013 – Deliberately Engineered?
D.C.'s Walmart 'Super Minimum Wage' Is a Super Bad Idea
US Egypt Policies Don't Pass the Laugh Test
Do Humanitarian Concerns Give the U.S. A Right to Bomb Syria?
Cost to Store All US Phonecalls Made in a Year in Cloud Storage so it could be Datamined
Ron Paul: Why Is Washington Backing Saudi Starvation Policy In Yemen?
Like Ted Cruz, Canadians had nothing against the United States, until now
Judge Napolitano: The NSA Scandal Violates the Lessons of Our History and Our Constitution