“Nancy Pelosi suggests that the U.S. should bomb Syria to save children. Does the U.S. have a right to defend children in Syria by bombing government installations? Even if some international lawyers devised some new sort of argument in support of U.S. bombing by basing it on some humanitarian rationale, the U.S. would still have a very difficult case to make. The U.S. has basically forfeited even such an imagined or hypothetical right by its earlier actions of supporting the rebel side. If it bombs Syria now, it is part of a pattern of having chosen the rebel side.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/do-humanitarian-concerns-give-the-u-s-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
America's 'Lab Rat Economy'
Ron Paul: The Drone Threat
The Ideology Behind “So What You’re Saying Is...”
FHA no longer will drop mortgage insurance premiums [2013]
Manning Show Trial Exposes the Fraud of Representative Democracy
Tighter Gun Laws Will Leave Libertarians Best-Armed Of All
Real Reason they Arrested Brandon Raub: Strip Him of His Right to Bear Arms
The Magnificent Failure of ObamaCare
Cypriot Chaos Assists EU Centralization
The Attack on U.S. Property Rights Continues
Judge Napolitano Weighs In On Effort To Change U.S. Tax Laws to Go After Offshore Tax Havens
U.S. Officials Are Above the Law of Nations and Ordinary Laws
Obama Denies Domestic Spying But He’s Wrong
The Enduring Glow of Gold
Bill Bonner: Gold 2.0
