“Attorney General Eric Holder can imagine a scenario in which it would be constitutional to carry out a drone strike against an American on American soil, he wrote in a letter to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. ‘It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,’ Holder replied to Paul’s question about whether Obama ‘has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.'”
Related posts:
How Many Hours of Work It Takes to Earn a Big Mac Around the World
Feds no longer need a warrant to search your phone location records
Trump to Relocate Israel Embassy to Jerusalem Over Protests
Q&A With Peter Schiff: Silver Looking Golden
Three States Dump Major Private Prison Company In One Month
Bitcoin seller btcQuick hits nearly $2m in sales
Google Launches Tools For Evading Government Control
4 Year Old’s Veggie Garden Must Go, Says USDA Subcontractor
Sanders Introduces Legislation to End Offshore Tax Havens
TD Waterhouse Bank begins FATCA Hunt and embraces role as IRS deputy
GMO-Fed Hamsters Become Infertile, Have Stunted Growth
Gov. Christie Threatens NJ Residents With Post-Storm Tax Hikes
‘Heroic effort at great personal cost’: Edward Snowden nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
LBMA: Volume Of Gold Transferred Climbs To 12-Year High In May On ETF Redemptions
Get Out of Muni Bond ETFs Now