
“The US Supreme Court heard argument Tuesday in a case testing whether government officials can routinely collect a person’s DNA at the time he or she is arrested and then use that DNA sample to try to link the individual to unsolved crimes. At issue in the case is whether taking a DNA sample from an arrestee without first obtaining a court-authorized warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. DNA material contains a plethora of highly personal information bound within a person’s genetic code. DNA might someday reveal information about an individual’s susceptibility to future diseases and perhaps even personality traits.”
Related posts:
Tesla's Elon Musk Is No Dummy
ECB's Celebration of Its New $1.4 Billion Tower Is Spoiled by Protesters
Nearly 2,500 British bankers paid over €1m, says EU regulator
Obama launches $100 million brain-mapping project
Oklahoma Attorney General May Defeat Obamacare, Judge Rules Lawsuit May Proceed
Justin Amash vs Former NSA Head General Michael Hayden 8/4/13
Nasty Gal: From eBay To Multimillion-Dollar Company In Seven Years
Tories begin defecting to Nigel Farage's UKIP over 'loons' slur
First Chinese military officials charged with stealing US companies' data
'Let it be an arms race': Donald Trump on nuclear expansion
Saving Europe's banks: EU gets landmark deal
Bipartisan bill would require a warrant for police to search emails
Mad Latvia defies its own people to join the euro
Cop's victim gets $795K after sexual assault in back seat of police car
Weed Is Serious Business for Canada’s Go-To Pot Banker