“The US Supreme Court heard argument Tuesday in a case testing whether government officials can routinely collect a person’s DNA at the time he or she is arrested and then use that DNA sample to try to link the individual to unsolved crimes. At issue in the case is whether taking a DNA sample from an arrestee without first obtaining a court-authorized warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. DNA material contains a plethora of highly personal information bound within a person’s genetic code. DNA might someday reveal information about an individual’s susceptibility to future diseases and perhaps even personality traits.”
Related posts:
Copper theft 'like an epidemic' sweeping US
Successful Entrepreneurs Share a Common History of Getting in Trouble as Teenagers
School Administrators Remove Army Men Cupcake Topping For Gun Control ‘Insensitivity’
Rocky Mountain high: Pot a $200M industry in Colorado
Trump reportedly calls Germans ‘very bad,’ threatens to end German car sales
NHS introduces £1,500 talking plate which warns fat families [2011]
Andrew Huszar: Confessions of a Quantitative Easer
China Devaluation Is Blow to Cash-Strapped Argentina’s Reserves
Neighborhood secession creeps into Scarborough property tax dispute
Italian newcomer Grillo predicts collapse in six months
Arkansas man gets prison term for smuggling paddlefish 'caviar'
UBS Given an Infusion of Capital (2008)
Illinois medical marijuana bill to be signed Thursday
SF Police shut down chess games on Market Street
Facebook Is Looking for Employees With National Security Clearances