“The US Supreme Court heard argument Tuesday in a case testing whether government officials can routinely collect a person’s DNA at the time he or she is arrested and then use that DNA sample to try to link the individual to unsolved crimes. At issue in the case is whether taking a DNA sample from an arrestee without first obtaining a court-authorized warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. DNA material contains a plethora of highly personal information bound within a person’s genetic code. DNA might someday reveal information about an individual’s susceptibility to future diseases and perhaps even personality traits.”
Related posts:
DEA regularly mines Americans' travel records to seize millions in cash
John Paulson holds onto gold ETF; Soros buys gold mining shares
State Department criticizes Google CEO’s North Korea visit
Financial Times: Other Countries Should Follow Germany's Gold Repatriation Lead
Swiss court convicts former IMF official over Czech mining scam
Chesapeake Energy drops legal fight over natural gas leases in New York state
School boards searching for Obamacare loopholes to avoid paying some benefits
Federal Reserve Monetary Policy To Target Wealth Inequality?
Ron Paul slams US on Crimea crisis: Russia sanctions 'an act of war'
Top EU official: Cyprus bank rescue new template
Big changes planned for Iraqi stock markets
D.C. Mayor Proposes More Speed Cameras to Balance Budget
Gold prices near lows of the year
125 shopping days left: Retailers start Xmas deals
Fortress’s Novogratz says bitcoin is in ‘inning 3 of a 9 inning game’