“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
(Visited 38 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The "Be Very Afraid" Society
Marijuana Legalization Wins Big on Election Night 2013
Bitcoin Magazine Interview: India
Senators Want Social Media Firms to Hunt for Terrorists
Don’t become a casualty of the War on Cash
US court renews permission to NSA to collect phone metadata
Here Comes The Federal Vaccination Registry System
7 reasons why Bitcoin is bigger than ever
Glenn Greenwald: Embassy closings looks like a conspiracy to silence NSA debate
ShapeShift Raises $525k, Reveals Erik Voorhees as Creator
Alabama man sentenced to prison for tweeting ‘let’s kill the president’
Amazon Launches Its Own Virtual Currency Called Coins
Obamacare Provision: "Forced" Home Inspections
Oregon: Jesus Malverde Medallion Did Not Justify Traffic Stop
CIA requested ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ rewrites, memo reveals