“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Russian Police arrests Libertarians during Adam Smith forum
Louisiana prison official: Raped 14-year-old inmate was no ‘Little Miss Muffin’
TSA contractors charged in drug smuggling scheme at SFO
Power vs. Market in California
New York Republican recommends ‘torture’ for teenage Boston bomb suspect
Getting Out Is Hard; Getting Back In Is Harder
First France, Now Brazil Unveils Internet Censorship To Combat “Fake News”
Green Party candidate: Police handcuffed me to a chair for eight hours
Max Keiser Interviews Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed
US and the Chalabi-ization of Syria
Mass hack attack on Yahoo Mail accounts prompts password reset
Litecoin users create 100 jobs in Madagascar
A Taxing Choice? PAC Checks May Ease the Pain
Europe's new financial transaction tax missing projected revenues
Government Shutdown: An Oxymoron for Real Morons