
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
After You Read This Kid’s Story, You’ll Think Twice About What You Post On Facebook.
3-D Printed Car Is as Strong as Steel, Half the Weight, and Nearing Production
U.S. Taxpayers Pay $574 Per Year to be Spied on by Their Own Government
Coca-Capitulation
In Stamps We Trust: Paving the Road to Prosperity with Food Stamps
High-Profile Dutch Lawyer Welcomes Bitcoin Payments
Bradley Manning found not guilty of aiding the enemy, but guilty of theft and espionage
Marijuana Stocks: How to Legally Invest in the Ultimate Cash Crop
Marc Emery Released from Solitary Confinement
Guess where the country’s highest incomes are? Think government contractors. A great map.
California Governor Calls for Legislation that will Increase Unemployment
After Silk Road Bust, And With Baidu’s Blessing, Bitcoin Breaks $200 Again
SnapCard launches bill-pay, makes the IRS its first payee
Montana House Votes 97-1 to approve anti-NDAA bill
Making Your Own Cryptocurrency Has Never Been Easier