
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Pennsylvanians Coerced To Give Cheek Swabs at 'Voluntary' Checkpoint
Bloomberg Host Gifted Bitcoin On TV And It Immediately Got Stolen
U.S. Reacts To Fukushima By Raising Acceptable Radiation Standards
Russia chides France, Spain and Portugal over Morales aircraft incident
Credit Union: Bitcoin's New Best Friends?
What If You're Innocent But Your Attorney Pleads Guilty?
The Council On Foreign Relations Says Domestic Propaganda Is Necessary
Will Disney Soon Be Able to Break into Computers... Legally?
Oklahoma Official Used Asset Forfeiture to Pay Back His Student Loans
Godfrey Bloom: Why the whole banking system is a scam
Campaign to Salvage Central Banking
Statist, Warmongering Retired Generals
Bitcoin Payment Network For Self-Driving Cars And Roads
Pittsburgh police relations meeting ends with white officer arresting black teacher
Wyden asks Obama’s terrorism chief for rules governing assassination of U.S. citizens