“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Russian warships enter Mediterranean to form permanent task force
The Secret Team - L. Fletcher Prouty (1989)
Ben Swann: President Obama Wants To Protect Children? Why Not End U.S. Drone Strikes?
In sudden announcement, US to give up control of DNS root zone
Bitcoin v Banks: 'Annoyance with system brings on virtual cash boom'
Bitcoin & Anarchy with Jeff Berwick
NDAA Indefinite Detention Opponents File Supreme Court Emergency Motion
Massachusetts: Police Cannot Search Nervous Motorists
BitPay Surpasses 10,000 Bitcoin Merchant Transactions, Zero Cases of Payment Fraud
Winklevosses to Submit Revised Bitcoin ETF to SEC
Yes, They Are Coming For People's Guns in California
How I Renounced My US Citizenship and Why, Part I
Democrats steamed that White House let the CIA censor a torture report
Blockchain.info Generates $300,000 Monthly Revenue
Danish government issues warning against Bitcoin