“While Senator Rand Paul’s drone filibuster will not restrain the Obama administration’s use of drones to carry out targeted killings of alleged terrorists and militants, it has laid bare an interesting alignment on the political landscape. Some nominally liberal commentators, such as Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift, accused Senator Paul and other opponents of the drone program of inciting sedition. America was founded on principled hostility to power, not unqualified submission to it. The Founders most likely wouldn’t recognize as Americans people who would entrust the president with the power of discretionary killing.”
http://prolibertate.us/index.php/is-it-seditious-to-oppose?blog=7
Related posts:
Tesla's first big vulnerability requires physical access to the car
Putin Laughs At Saudi Offer To Betray Syria In Exchange For "Huge" Arms Deal
The Relentless Market for “Saturday Night Specials”
The U.S. Keeping the Eurozone in Line
Florida Police Sergeant Fired Over Bogus DUI Arrest Of Lawyer
On Target Pressure Points: The Electronic Concentration Camp
Obama rodeo clown: People have lost their ability to laugh
Who Gave Hollywood's Representatives the Same Exact DMCA Question?
Russians Engineer a Brilliant Slot Machine Cheat, And Casinos Have No Fix
NH Representative Mark Warden Utilizing Bitcoin for Campaign Donations
The Dark Web Drug Lords Who Got Away
Iran Virtually Ends Drug Executions While U.S. Drug War Marches On
What Do You Call a Tool to Help Uber Avoid Gov't Stings? A Good Start.
Despite focus on right turn photo enforcement, turns on red rarely dangerous
BitPremier Sells Luxury Goods For Bitcoin