“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
After riots, Mohamed Morsi declares emergency in three Egyptian cities
Journalist beaten to death, encased in concrete for $100K in Magic cards
US issues health warning over mercury fillings [2008]
Eagle Scout Facing Expulsion over Gun Charge
U.S. to provide ‘direct military support’ to Syrian rebels
A new, dangerous job in Mogadishu: tax collector
Pilotless Planes, Pacific Tensions
Trouble Could Be Looming for Puerto Rico Bond Insurers
Bitcoin Fever Catches on in India
Functioning guillotine to be auctioned in France
Centuries-old disfiguring plague breaks out due to the war in Syria
Why Bitcoin is the banking industry’s newest, biggest threat
Bitcoin fund raises $65 million after first two months, founder says
A Long List of What We Know Thanks to Private Manning
Billionaire Saudi prince fires celebrity TV preacher for Muslim Brotherhood links