“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
Obama announces proposals to reform NSA surveillance
Russia defiant as U.S. raises pressure over Snowden
Argentina: Dollar price at 10.45 Pesos over two times the 'official' price
How Long Can a Cop Keep You After a Traffic Stop? No One's Sure
Credit card donations to WikiLeaks once again flowing through Iceland
Ex-Port Authority Official Says Christie Knew About Lane Closings
Utah launches new federalism commission to push back Washington
Visa CEO Says Traditional Payment Networks Trump Bitcoin
David Miranda: I was treated like a threat to the United Kingdom
Hollande warns on euro strength, denounces markets for currencies
Police Allegedly Fire 41 Shots At Unarmed Man
Saudi Arabia opens luxury ‘religious extremist’ rehab center for Al-Qaeda militants
Greek bank official dismisses 'haircut' report as "baseless"
Obama names campaign donor, Goldman exec as ambassador to Canada
U.N. seeks detailed Mali military intervention plan