“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
China’s shadow banking reform faces its first test
Gerard Depardieu claims world citizenship
World Watches as Danes Venture Below Zero
Yemeni journalist who reported U.S. drone strike released from jail
Prominent Russian Economist Flees Country
Del. hospital doctor busted for selling illegal drugs for Bitcoins
Italian factory owner moves company to Poland while staff are on holiday
Elmore City Police Chief Says He Was Fired Over 'Ticket Quota'
Tech Companies Concede to NSA Surveillance Program
Muslim Brotherhood pushes for more protests after bloody ‘Day of Rage’
Bitcoin Changes Hands At South Korean Bakery Franchise
Police Salaries and Pensions Push California City to Brink
Yemeni-Americans Say U.S. Embassy Unfairly Revoked Passports
School District Ends Policy Of Forcing Students To Kneel Down For Dismissal
Secret NSA loophole allows data gathering on U.S. citizens without a warrant