“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
YouTube Is Serving Covert Cryptocurrency Mining Ads
Gallup Sued By DOJ After Unfavorable Obama Polls, Unemployment Numbers
The Soviet Colonel Who Averted Nuclear War
Meltdowns Hobble NSA Data Center
Japan economics minister warns of premature QE exit
US agencies spied from 'false facade' on roof of Geneva mission
Rally at Oklahoma Capitol opposes U.S. intervention in Syria
Man arrested for posting image of burning poppy on Twitter
Foreign Retirement Plans Seen Scrutinized in U.S. FATCA Effort
Judge rules Portland teen not guilty after phone video contradicts police
China Bans Payment Companies Working With Bitcoin Exchanges?
Egypt Widens Crackdown and Meaning of ‘Islamist’
German Chancellor Angela Merkel says no country will have to leave eurozone
Americans find it difficult to open bank accounts in UAE
Western Investors Cash in on Chinese Surveillance Program Targeting Muslims For 'Re-Education'