“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
U.S. Customs seizes American nurse's $42,000 earmarked for Nigerian clinic
WSJ: How MDMA Went From Club Drug to ‘Breakthrough Therapy’
Germany Said to Review ‘No-Spy’ Buying Rules Amid U.S. Row
Honduras police seize $50,000 gold-plated AK-47 rifle
Black Panther's conviction overturned after 43 years in Louisiana solitary cell
Massachusetts bans vehicles at 4 p.m.; offenders face fine up to $500, 1 year in jail
'You were rude to the President' Medea Benjamin: 'Killing innocent people with drones is rude'
Iran currency crisis sparks Tehran street clashes
The 10 Best Jobs in America
Fed Pulls QE3 Trigger; Will Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates
Is There Hope for Recent College Grads?
Entire New York Town Placed On Lockdown Over Police Standoff
Companies cut hours of full-time employees to avoid providing health care under new rules
IRS Data Web Snares Mostly Low- and Middle-Income Taxpayers
Rumsfeld: Obama hasn’t justified Syria attack