“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
NYC not liable for processing fake deed allowing theft of woman’s home
Fed fears risks posed by exit tools; plan almost done
Ex-President Jimmy Carter plans to visit North Korea to negotiate prisoner's release
Trump’s CIA Director Wants to Return to a Pre-Snowden World
Deutsche Bank May Be Top Contributor to Systemic Risk, IMF Says
Bipartisan lawmakers tell Trump to respect state marijuana laws
Irish 'rage' after bank cheated on multi-billion bailout
Black Market Arises In Cash Conversions Following India's Cash Ban
Big jump in number of millennials living with parents reported
Made Poor by the Crisis: Millions of Europeans Require Red Cross Food Aid
Coerced Foreign Tax Compliance Is Killing American Jobs
Woman taken down, handcuffed for not showing rental agreement quickly enough
Russian Banks Experience Foreign Cash Crunch
China's new playground: America's backyard
Russia boosting gold holdings as defence against 'political risks'