“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Pentagon in 2012: 75,000 troops needed to secure Syria chemical weapons
Bovard: Facebook censored me for criticizing the government
Venezuela's gold reserves fall 24% in 18 months
Croatian Swiss franc debtors demand central bank governor resign
Web inventor warns governments: Internet has no off switch
Italy’s Saipem Plans 8,800 Job Cuts After Oil Price Falls
Homeland Security training TSA workers to save themselves in shooting?
Top Chinese official warn of 'empty cities' emerging in China
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas arrested at UK fracking protest
US says Turk offensive in Syria is 'disruptive' to its own open-ended occupation
Obama offers 'grand bargain' on corporate tax rate, infrastructure
Late Marc Rich’s Swiss mansions for sale
Japanese university to retract Novartis study based on fabricated data
Cyprus Central Bank Governor resigns with $250K golden parachute
Bitcoin Comes Under Senate Scrutiny