“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Billionaire Soros Cuts U.S. Stocks by 37%, Buys Gold Miner Barrick
Globetrotting St. Louis pot entrepreneur sentenced to 15 years in prison
With Bullets Scarce, More Shooters Make Their Own
Cubans ditch exit permits for international travel
Bitcoin Startup 21 Unveils Plan For Embeddable Mining Chips
France revealed to be spying on its citizens’ phone calls, email and social media
Lawmakers urge Obama to allow public debate on military action against Syria
Feds mobilize against additional hits on their pocketbooks
Fund to Let Investors Bet on Price of Bitcoins
Obama Says Bernanke Has Been at Fed ‘Longer Than He Wanted’
Addiction to morphine and heroin can be blocked: research
Argentina mulls benefits cut for dollar buyers
Urban farming springs up on rooftops in hyper-crowded Hong Kong
Foreign embassies in London hard hit as HSBC closes their bank accounts
Associates defend anti-gun activist found carrying gun inside school