“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Think New York Is Costly? In New Delhi, Seedy Goes for 8 Figures
Charlotte police kill man running to them for help
Saudi Arabia to allow women to drive
Kenyans outraged at MPs' six-figure, tax-funded World Cup 2018 trip
Investment firm VanEck calls bitcoin a 'fad,' then files for bitcoin ETF
How the Air Force blew $1 billion on a dud system [2012]
Settlement for officer who assaulted mentally handicapped teen in his home
Alibaba to boost IPO size on "overwhelming" demand
Companies 'work around' U.S. oil export ban
Texas Women Subjected to Roadside Cavity Search Speak Out After Troopers Indicted
Hong Kong protesters back Edward Snowden, denounce allegations of U.S. spying
Easton bank protester will face threats charges
5 Obamacare Scams and How to Avoid Them
Police blame 'poor lighting' after killing innocent grandfather, 72, while searching the wrong home
L.A. County Sheriff's Department will fire seven deputies who formed gang