“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Canada finally legalizes marijuana, leaves regulation to provinces
Bitcoin goes big: Wall Street, Silicon Valley aboard
Venezuela becomes next country to ban its own money, citing vast conspiracy
Italy’s Credit Rating Cut to BBB by S&P; Outlook Stays Negative
Cyprus, lenders reach bailout deal; 40% deposit tax agreed
Leaked documents show massive expansion of CIA budget
Massive anti-government protest gears up in Poland
Pilotless Planes, Pacific Tensions
Chinese farmer ‘privatizes’ part of Great Wall to develop new tourist attraction
Fed Accused Of Sending Nude Selfie To Woman Who Needed Help
Despite fever, CDC cleared Ebola-infected nurse for airline flight
'Make 401(k) Auto-Enrollment Mandatory'
UN to investigate legality of U.S drone strikes
NSA chief defends his agency’s ‘noble mission’ to defend the U.S.
Afghans reject US-favored administrative detention