“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
6-year-old Colorado girl in national spotlight over medical marijuana
CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack
Paulson claimed Russia 'planned Wall Street bear raid' in 2008
School districts drop federal lunch program after kids won't eat
'The Hazards of Lending to Bitcoin Users'
Drug czar: No state can nullify federal marijuana ban
Ex-Hillsboro cop surrenders after shootout with police with wife, daughter at his side
Greece should defy the gunboat creditors
San Francisco split by Silicon Valley's wealth
Spanish spy chief to address Parliament on spying
US judge says ex-AIG CEO can depose Bernanke over bailout
Obama won’t push Middle East peace initiative in Israel trip
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden applies for temporary asylum in Russia
U.S. to meet with Taliban ‘within days’
World's costliest auctioned car 'in Swiss hands'