“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Washington State issues how-to regs on growing, selling marijuana
Sony Left Passwords, Code-Signing Keys Virtually Unprotected
Fort Hood shooting suspect apologizes for U.S. ‘illegal and immoral aggression’ against Muslims
Hollande begs UK Labour Party to back bombing ISIS in Syria
9 NYC Stores Fined for Propping Air-Conditioned Doors Open [2010]
More Americans opting out of banking system
Rooftop urban gardeners in Bangkok grow edible algae
Australia’s richest person Gina Rinehart would let prisoners ‘pay for freedom’
Somali militants claim 'blowback' motivation for Nairobi mall attack
For U.S. investors sour on Apple, buying Samsung is tricky [2013]
Man, 28, and stepdaughter, 21, not biologically related, face jail for incest
ICE abducts 146 workers in raid on Ohio meat facility
US Army vet charged with fighting alongside al-Qaida against Syrian government
SF Police shut down chess games on Market Street
Jump in Swiss jobs good news for expats