“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Can Government Officials Have You Arrested for Speaking to Them?
Israeli PM ordered strike on Iran in 2010
Beekeepers sue EPA over failing to stop harmful pesticides
Rock-bottom vacancy rates push Colorado rents to all-time high
Marc Faber: I would own physical gold
America’s new target shooters: Younger, female and urban
Bitcoin and Poker: Zynga's Best Friends
Robert Parker’s wine ‘bible’ moving to Singapore
Japan Follows Hawaii With Its Own False Missile Warning
The secret history of drones
Fed Balance Sheet Hits Record $3 Trillion
Cairo property prices lead many to live in cemeteries
Argentinian vet designs $3 IUD device to boost beef production
Japan economy shrinks more than expected in face of sales tax hike
Guantánamo commander admits listening devices eavesdropped on lawyer meetings with clients