
“Police following up on drunk driving investigations will no longer be able to draw their suspect’s blood without a court order authorizing the search, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday. In a 5-4 decision, with Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Elena Kagan making up the majority, the court ruled that the natural expiration of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute ‘destruction of evidence,’ which would otherwise give officers cause for a warrantless search.”
Related posts:
Phishers Divert Home Loan Earnest Money By Altering E-mails
UK home secretary warns Yahoo over its move to Dublin [2014]
How Congress and drug company lobbyists worked to neutralize the DEA
Russian lawmaker charged with racism over ‘Obama banana’ image
New tax law driving expats to renounce U.S. citizenship
Yosemite fire prompts state of emergency in San Francisco
Church of England declares war on payday loans firm
N.J. politician pushes for law requiring pets buckle up on car rides
Twitter report: U.S. leads the world in demands for user information
‘How to Make Money Selling Drugs’
Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower: 'I do not expect to see home again'
Man spends 2 years forgotten about in solitary after DWI arrest
Kremlin turns back to typewriters to avoid security leaks
Overstock CEO: 'I don't own bitcoin, but I'm a fan'
FBI to tear down its headquarters; no plans to sow salt in earth at site