“Police following up on drunk driving investigations will no longer be able to draw their suspect’s blood without a court order authorizing the search, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday. In a 5-4 decision, with Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Elena Kagan making up the majority, the court ruled that the natural expiration of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute ‘destruction of evidence,’ which would otherwise give officers cause for a warrantless search.”
Related posts:
Is Trump Going to Lie Our Way Into War With Iran?
Former heart surgeon sues Jackson County, sheriff over false arrest, land seizure
Indian man buys $230,000 solid gold shirt as investment
Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required
Man who knew Boston bombing suspect was unarmed when killed by FBI during questioning
Russia Backs Bitcoin Curbs as Central Bank Snubs Sberbank Plan
Should Bales Bail?
Jobless Greek youth find innovative ways to make a living
Google blocks video after losing Brazil court battle
Children are one of the 'War on Drugs' casualties
Jim Rogers: Gold To Make A Bottom Over 1-2 Years, I'm Not Selling
Video Shows Rocket Attack on Suez Canal Ship, Group Says
Scientists use iPhones to diagnose intestinal worms
Lawsuit Accuses Fired Utah Trooper of Falsifying D.U.I. Arrests
PayPal president David Marcus: Bitcoin is good, NFC is bad