“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
Bullion and Bandits: The Improbable Rise and Fall of E-Gold (2009)
Top 5 moments of Rand Paul’s filibuster
Lavabit Owner Faces $10K Fine For Protecting Users From Federal Spying
Intelligence chief defends Internet spying program
Air Force sexual assault prevention officer arrested for fondling woman
Video: Huge Protests In Brazil Sweep The Country
IRS Refunds 4 Billion Dollars a Year to Illegal Immigrants While Pursuing US Citizens Abroad
Bitcoin Startup Bitmarkers Disrupts $140 Billion Real World Casino Industry
Chicago Is Trying to Pay Down Its Debt by Impounding Innocent People’s Cars
Maker of Airport Body Scanners Suspected of Falsifying Software Tests
A Company That Performs in all Markets
What Price Inflation? ... Ask Wall Street Party Organizers
Gun Revolution: The WikiWeapons Project (3D Printer)
Solutions: Overcoming Stockholm Syndrome
Cop who wanted to photograph teen’s erection in sexting case commits suicide