“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
Entrepreneurs, Engineers, Evangelists: Crypto Currency Con 2013
State Dept cites D-Day as example of ‘strong relationship’ with Germany
Now Mexico Bans Cash Transactions
Gold replaces narcotics as the most valued smuggled item in India
Last Week’s Mortgage Applications Were at a 13-Year Low
Will the Internet Complicate the Evolution of the Marijuana Industry?
Judge Orders California DA To Return Family's Confiscated Life Savings
Ben Swann Reality Check: Monsanto and Crony Capitalism
Syracuse’s ‘most prolific sex offender’ lied to acquire government job
The New York Times Company Sells the Boston Globe at a 96% Loss
Why the Only Real Way to Buy Bitcoins Is on the Streets
'London Whale' Bruno Iksil Won't Be Prosecuted By Justice Department
NSA can hack WiFi devices from eight miles away
The Truth About Fake Hospital Pricing (And What To Do If You Are Uninsured)
Digital Currency: Coming to a Store Near You