“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
Massive Protests Break Out in Brazil
Veterans struggle with benefit claims thanks to missing war records
Poll suggests win for initiative repealing Michigan’s emergency managers law
Serious Revolving Door Move (Hedge Fund Edition)
Fracking protestors and their petro-sourced belongings
"Miracle" Cannabis Oil May Treat Cancer, But Money and the Law Stand in the Way of Finding Out
Stock-Market Rally Watch, Part III
Need a New Knee? This Lithuanian Clinic Will Give You One for Bitcoin
Maker Of Candy Crush Game Just Filed For A $500 Million IPO
Maryland Senate Votes To Cover Up Speed Camera Errors
Sovietizing the Homeland Security State
10 Ways to Commit Nutritional Anarchy
Reps. Bachmann, Gohmert and King thank Egyptian military for coup
Egyptian military vows lethal response ahead of nationwide ‘March of Anger’
Nigel Farage: Eurozone completely incompatible with nation-state democracy