“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
Michigan: Municipalities Ignoring Voters' Will Regarding Marijuana Liberalization Measures
Woman Eaten In 45 Minutes By Protected Species Of Vultures
Minnesota Starts to Regulate and Track Gold Coin Dealers
Dear police: The world is watching when you kill our children
Automatic Record-a-Cop App for Smart Phones
Bradley Manning found not guilty of aiding the enemy, but guilty of theft and espionage
Bitcoin Foundation On Capitol Hill, Day Two: Legislators
Which Fed Members Move the Market?
Disabled Duck Gets A New Foot Thanks to 3D Printing Technology
Picking Winners in a Field of Losers
Ms. Yellen, It’s a Trap!
Food Stamp Nation
Glenn Beck calls for celebrating Ramadan by shooting all Guantanamo prisoners in the head
Jim Rogers shares insights on his book Street Smarts
Bitcoin & Sneaks Law with Jeffrey Paul