“Progressive” Hypocrisy on House-to-House Searches

thelrcblog-5002

“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution.  The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion.  Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’  So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html

Scan to Donate Bitcoin to Freedomwat.ch Staff
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin