“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
89-year-old German grandmother gets 2 years in prison for Auschwitz comments
Feds Threaten To Arrest Lavabit Founder For Shutting Down His Service
‘Paradigm shift’: Bitcoin to replace ‘broken’ government currencies?
US State Bank Supervisors to Discuss Bitcoin at Public Hearing
10 Ways to Commit Nutritional Anarchy
Bank Crisis Arrives: €29B Bremen Landesbank On The Verge Of Failure
Democrats steamed that White House let the CIA censor a torture report
Court Allows Destruction of Digital Voting Records Amid Hacking Fears
New lithium-ion battery design: 2,000 times more powerful, recharges 1,000 times faster
Bitcoin: China’s New Special Economic Zone
Dirt Boxes: The Newest Government Tool for Warrantless Privacy Invasion
Australian government forces citizens to answer intimate questions about sex partners or face jail t...
Oil Spikes Higher After Trump Threatens Allies With Sanctions For Buying Iranian Oil
TSA removes X-ray body scanners from major airports
"Most people are yet to understand how disruptive [Bitcoin] is."