“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
The Dark Web Drug Lords Who Got Away
FBI admits to flying drones over US without warrants
Dutch Bitcoin Exchange Bitplaats Expands to Belgium
RT Venture Capital: Muslim money & extending Bitcoin influence
Wi-Fi Trashcans Now Silently Tracking Your Smartphone Data
Max Keiser Breaks Down Bitcoin
America’s Diminishing Economic Liberty
Nigel Farage: EU wants to steal money from Cypriots bank accounts
Veterans struggle with benefit claims thanks to missing war records
Is Cannabis Weed Oil a Miracle Drug?
US Regulators: the World’s Bitcoin Police?
12 Medical marijuana miracles you should know about
ACLU: Email reveals feds misled judges to abuse wiretapping powers
Trump Impeachment Begins (But Not For War Crimes Or JFK Cover-Up)
Official 9/11 Claim Disputed That No Airliner Black Boxes Were Found