
“Sen. Paul also apparently would not object to using drones domestically in critical police actions: ‘If there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them.’ Paul also said in the Salon article: ‘Here’s the distinction, I have never argued against any technology being used against having an imminent threat an act of crime going on…’ ‘Imminent threats’ have a way of breeding like lemmings….”
Related posts:
Kansas rejects marijuana advocacy group’s bid to adopt a highway
Our Immigration System Is Leaving Iraqi and Afghan Translators to Die
Starbucks CEO: ‘Guns are not a part of the Starbucks experience’
Luxury Berlin Apartment bought with Bitcoin
The Small Business Health Care Credit: CPA explains why it doesn't work. [2010]
Silicon Valley VC Thinks a Single Bitcoin Will Be Worth $100,000
Student Loan Consequences: Real, Costly, and Personal
Have a Gmail Account? Want to See what NSA 'Metadata' Really Means?
3D-Printed Handgun Prompts Congressman To Propose Impotent Legislation
Bitcoin Transcends Novelty Status
Can Your Edward Jones Financial Advisor Really Serve Your Best Interests?
41% of Trump Voters, 19% of Democrats Want to Bomb 'Aladdin' Country
NY Senate passes bill making 'annoying' police a crime
Sessions/Trump Pull Off an Amazing Feat -- Making the DEA Look Reasonable
BGPSEC: More Internet Control In The Name Of “Security”