
“Despite the fact that the FBI was accused of hiding information from judges when obtaining authorization for use of the secretive ‘Stingray’ cell phone tracking device, a judge has ruled that the use of the device by federal agents was lawful. On Wednesday, Judge David Campbell dismissed the motion to suppress the information gathered through the Stingray device in the case of Daniel Rigmaiden. Campbell ruled that the use of the Stingray did not in fact constitute a ‘severe intrusion’ and ruled that ‘no Fourth Amendment violation occurred.'”
Related posts:
'Flaky' Syrian Chemical Weapons Evidence Does Not Deter Neo-Cons
Illinois Legislative Leaders Sue Governor Over Vetoing Lawmakers' Pay Raise
Colombia Stops Short of Bitcoin Ban, Bars Banks From Industry
New Zealand Regulates -- Not Bans -- Synthetic Drugs
Why the US is Really Chasing War With Syria
Larry Lessig Threatened With Bogus DMCA Notice; Decides To Fight Back
TSA Creates New Watchlist Of Those Who Failed Pre-Check Applications
Stefan Molyneux, Bitcoin: The Psychology of Money
What NSA Transparency Looks Like
Thoughts on “Assault Weapons” and “Magazine Limits” from an Actual Gun Expert
NYPD drags 48-year-old naked woman into hallway as neighbors protest
Pentagon plans to fight ‘War on Terror’ for another 20 years
House unexpectedly votes to stop warrantless NSA searches
The EU Joins the Syrian War More Directly
CNN’s Sanjay Gupta apologizes for misleading Americans about marijuana