“I keep hearing from your side that you have noble motives for your opposition to marijuana legalization. I hear that all you care about is using scientific inquiry to determine what is best for the people. However, I’m not sure if you’re aware of it, but you keep talking about things in ways that aren’t scientific, or that are meaningless without the proper context. That kind of thing may have worked once, but in general, people are a little more sophisticated about scientific knowledge — they no longer uncritically accept ‘Here be dragons’ for cartography or ‘If she floats, she’s a witch’ as a judicial system.”
Related posts:
Not Worth a Continental
Cyprus and the Unraveling of Fractional-Reserve Banking
They Live, We Sleep: A Dictatorship Disguised as a Democracy
The Idiot’s Guide to Becoming a Bitcoin Billionaire
The Security State’s Reaction to Snowden Shows Why It’s Doomed
Poor Economy = Low Gold Price?
Paul Craig Roberts: Coup d’etat
Jeffrey Tucker: Mises Can Save the World
A Commissarina Rises: Wendy J. Olson's Reign of Terror
An Investment that Thrives, Even in a Weak Economy
John Whitehead: ‘I am not a number. I am a free man!’
The Sad History of U.S. Peace Negotiations
Uber vs. the State, 1851 Edition
Gun Ownership: American Exceptionalism
Jeffrey Tucker: Thank You, Russia?
