“I keep hearing from your side that you have noble motives for your opposition to marijuana legalization. I hear that all you care about is using scientific inquiry to determine what is best for the people. However, I’m not sure if you’re aware of it, but you keep talking about things in ways that aren’t scientific, or that are meaningless without the proper context. That kind of thing may have worked once, but in general, people are a little more sophisticated about scientific knowledge — they no longer uncritically accept ‘Here be dragons’ for cartography or ‘If she floats, she’s a witch’ as a judicial system.”
Related posts:
An Armed People in Mexico and Their Threat to the State
Southern Slavery: Two Systems of Management
A New "Global Standard" Takes Shape
Doug Casey on Internationalizing Your Cash
Obamacare and the New Soviet Man
Detlev Schlichter: Good riddance to deposit ‘insurance’
Truth and Consequences of Fed Money Printing
Larken Rose: The Complete and Undeniable Truth
Four Centuries of Surveillance: From Privy Councils to FISA Courts
To The US Govt, Failure To Disclose Foreign Accounts Is Worse Than Child Porn
The State, Not Manning, is the Criminal
Bill Bonner: You Say You Want a Revolution
A Real Life Thelma and Louise: the US and the EU
John Hussman: Over-Adaptation and Market Drawdowns
Peter Schiff: The Biggest Loser
