“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
Alaskan border town may use Canadian dollars, but they’re ‘100% American’
Bitcoin digital currency appearing in New Orleans small businesses
Iraq war killed 120,000 and cost $800 billion, study estimates
Christie administration files suit against 8 businesses accused of price gouging
Top Treasury Official Sees No Widespread Criminal Bitcoin Use
'Anarchy at door, West starts to rebuild Libyan army'
When is a coup not a coup?
Afghan customs fines hike cost of U.S. military pullout
What Are Stores Collecting When They Swipe Your ID?
Bitcoin Crash Spurs Race to Create New Exchanges
Italy's Political Scandals Rattle Public Trust
Contagion Spreads in Emerging Markets as Crises Grow
Mexico’s peyote casts mind-bending spell on tourists
Quantum Spying: GCHQ Used Fake LinkedIn Pages to Target Engineers
Are We Underestimating America's Fracking Boom?