“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
Obama rejects calls for independent probe of IRS scandal
Costa Rica Probes Liberty Reserve Founder Marriage
Pay heed to the internet's Third Wave Cows of Disruption
China media warns Philippines of 'counterstrike' in South China Sea
Bank Card Skimmers Installed at Some Calif., Colo. Safeways
Report: Casino Billionaire Sheldon Adelson Headed to Israel to Hook-Up with Romney
Russia Issues Travel Warning to Its Citizens About U.S. and Extradition
Leaked documents show massive expansion of CIA budget
Iowa implementing face recognition program to track sex offenders
Egypt battles energy crunch with ban on too-cold air conditioners
Actor Edward Norton raises $425,000 for Syrian refugee featured on website
Ex-Fed chief Bernanke denied loan to refinance his home
Man was unarmed when fatally shot by Fairfax police officer
Maryland 'rain tax' to be enforced through satellite surveillance?
Black Market Arises In Cash Conversions Following India's Cash Ban