“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
Irish man facing U.S. extradition for hosting largest child porn network on the planet
Court: Iceland doesn’t need to repay UK and Dutch depositors
How a 1983 US-NATO war game came close to provoking nuclear attack
FoxConn will pay Microsoft royalties to produce Android, Chrome phones and televisions
Ex-cop: Cops lied, put innocent people behind bars, to reach arrest quotas
Chinese spacecraft completes space-docking mission
Russian Banks Experience Foreign Cash Crunch
Valedictorian fights for diploma after using the word 'hell' in graduation speech
U.S. denies alleged plot against Venezuelan government
Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri calls for U.S. attacks and economic boycott
Afghan president: U.S. special forces creating ‘insecurity and instability’
Bank depositors to suffer losses in new EU law
‘Wall St.’ flees NY for tax-free Florida
California D.A.: Mom Facing Jail Time Over Homemade Ceviche Is Overreacting
Bitcoin beginning to go mainstream