“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
The ghosts of America's Cold War surveillance network pictured crumbling in Berlin
Stolen Target Credit Cards Are Selling For $20 - $100 Each
Three electric vehicles have joined Europe's biggest loser's list
California governor signs bill legalizing Bitcoin, other digital currencies
The World’s Richest Country
Protesters in Egypt attack ruling party Muslim Brotherhood's headquarters after deadly clashes
U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands
India’s financial prophet Raghuram Rajan to run central bank
Australia Stock Market Set to Shrink on Foreign Takeovers, Rocket Higher
Peugeot targets Iran to tap post-sanctions industrial recovery
China Devaluation Is Blow to Cash-Strapped Argentina’s Reserves
Welfare States: Federal Grants Now a Third of State Revenue
Budget analysts project $1.1T federal deficit this year
Glenn Greenwald: US drone strikes target rescuers in Pakistan – and the west stays silent
Cypriot finance minister says "no truth" to resignation reports