“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
This Is What Happens When An H-Bomb Explodes Over North Carolina
U.S. Customs seizes American nurse's $42,000 earmarked for Nigerian clinic
Ravaged by Oil’s Collapse, Venezuela Now Has a Big Gold Problem
Financier amasses $1 billion in mining investments, plans hedge fund
Beauty Offshore: A Caribbean Passport For A Chinese Restaurateur
NHS pulls the plug on its £11bn IT system [2011]
State seizes couple's four babies due to father's juvenile sex offense
X-Ray Scans at Airports Leave Lingering Worries
A drug dog named ‘Guilty’
Bitcoins gain traction in Argentina
Rich Manhattan moms hire handicapped tour guides to cut lines at Disney World
Wary eyes shift to the skies as unmanned aircraft are tested in Oklahoma
China Tells Banks to Improve Disclosures in Shadow-Lending Fight
$3.4M settlement in deadly 2011 SWAT raid near Tucson
Dead Gitmo detainee was cleared for release in 2009