“‘We managed to survive greater threats in our history . . . than a few disorganized terrorist groups and rogue states without resorting to these sorts of programs. It is not that I do not value intelligence, but that I oppose . . . omniscient, automatic, mass surveillance. . . . That seems to me a greater threat to the institutions of free society than missed intelligence reports, and unworthy of the costs. Analysts (and government in general) aren’t bad guys, and they don’t want to think of themselves as such,’ he replied. But he said they labored under a false premise that ‘if a surveillance program produces information of value, it legitimizes it.'”
Related posts:
US nearly detonated atomic bomb over North Carolina [2013]
Online sales tax to be added to National Defense Authorization Act
The FBI's Plan For The Millions Worth Of Bitcoins Seized From Silk Road
150 People Arrested In NAACP Protest Against NC Republicans
4,000 silver coins found in Roman treasure trove in Swiss orchard
Man with walking stick puts three Sapulpa schools on lockdown
Swiss court rules handing over bank employee info to US illegal
Some consumer PCs also appear to have dangerous Intel exploit
Houston passes law requiring photographs, fingerprints of gold sellers
Venezuela issues ID cards to curtail food hoarding
Snowden files reveal NSA plans to distribute malware via app stores
German pilot in WWII and American B-17 pilot he spared reunite 40 years later
Trump executive order keeps Guantanamo Bay military prison open
Japan nuclear body says radioactive water at Fukushima an ‘emergency’
New Gold Import Tax In Sri Lanka