“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
Good Morning, Sweetheart: Now You're On Fire, Courtesy of the Local Police
The Terrifying Future of The United States
Not exactly the brightest way to smuggle gold…
Florida pot grower busted for manufacturing ‘high-end assault rifles’
Russia’s Top Cyber Sleuth Foils US Spies, Helps Kremlin Pals
Henry Hazlitt at The New York Times
Texas House approves bundle of radical pro-gun laws
Stewart: 2 years and $3 billion later, U.S. in ‘same place we were’ before election
Video Shows Chicago Cop Executing Laquan McDonald in Street
National weather agency spared from furloughs after rash of tornadoes
Court Deals Blow to Anonymity and First Amendment
The DOJ’s “Operation Choke Point” Has Driven 30 Industries To Bitcoin
Obama Nat'l Security Adviser Admits U.S. Armed Jihadists In Syria
Even more smuggled gold enters India
DEA Agent Joins Marijuana Industry
