“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
Man Offers Random People A Free One Ounce Gold Coin: No Takers
USDA Tells Missouri Magician to Write Disaster Plan for His Rabbit
Elites Play Waiting Game with Europe
‘Pothole Robin Hood’ Steals Asphalt, Fixes Potholes, Faces Possible Charges
Iraq: The ‘Humanitarian Catastrophe’ That Petered Out
Florida: Court Approves Detaining Motorists at Toll Booth
Fed Warns of 'Escalating Threats' to U.S. Payment System
Before Sir John Marks Templeton, there was Cleveland Ferguson
Marc Faber: Even QE99 won't help US; India best in Asia
Mike Hearn, Bitcoin Developer - Turing Festival 2013
Florida woman charged with felony battery for kissing cop’s nose
16 Most 'Systemically Important Banks' In The World See Their Stocks Crash
Payza Introduces Bitcoin Buying Option in 190 Countries
Court: WiFi Sniffing Can Be Wiretapping Because WiFi Isn't Audio
Oracle security chief to customers: Stop checking our code for vulnerabilities