“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
John Whitehead: Round Ups, Checkpoints and National ID Cards
Obama's Response To NSA Surveillance Still Lacking Justification
Justin Raimondo: The Mossad Caucus Exposed
Department of Homeland Security Giving Firms Free Penetration Tests
DNC Chair Banned After WikiLeaks Reveals Anti-Sanders Collusion
India's pain is UAE's gain - Indian expats buy up gold jewellery
Graphic: How Just 6 Corps Own 90% of The Media
Bitcoin Has Been On A Huge Tear Lately
ICE gains access to database that tracks license plates in realtime
Only in NH: How to Ferment a Nano-Brewvolution
Say Goodbye to Open Borders
Dark money: only 35 Bitcoin dealers are compliant with US law
The Markets Are Rigged! How to Opt Out and Still Profit
Boston Federal Court House Evacuated Due To Press Presence, Bagpipe Player
Chicago’s Sky-High Tobacco Tax Creates a Huge Black Market
