“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
Congress Needs to Put a Stop to Asset Forfeiture
Susan Rice for National Security Advisor?
6 Things Bitcoiners Are Talking About That You've Never Heard Of
Swiss socialist politician asks government to create report on bitcoin
"You Know How to Leave": Scenes from a Police Riot in Idaho Falls
The Black Swan In Plain Sight---Debt Out The Wazoo
Bitrated: You Can No Longer Say Bitcoin Has No Consumer Protection
Sen. Rubio ‘open’ to cutting off all Muslim student visas
Dad Breaks Down Over Having Called Chicago Cops Who Killed His Son
Illegal gold mining costs Uganda millions in lost revenue
In WikiLeaks Probe, Feds Used a Secret Search Warrant to Get Volunteer’s Gmail
Will the Internet Complicate the Evolution of the Marijuana Industry?
Meet the NSA's disturbing Earth Day mascot, Dunk
Terminator to the rescue? Watch the most advanced humanoid robot in action
Americans Used to Tar-and-Feather Tax Collectors
