
“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
Related posts:
Walmart Rejects Apple Pay For Rival Payments Service
Republican Party of Texas Backs Marijuana Decriminalization
Nerf toy causes lockdown at Long Island school
Entrepreneurs increasingly accepting 'bitcoins' in India
Spanish savers move money to Switzerland
Decorated, wounded Marine treated 'shamefully' by TSA screeners
Japan rejecting Osaka mayor's view that ‘Comfort Women’ were ‘necessary’
Kremlin turns back to typewriters to avoid security leaks
Hundreds of fast food workers strike in New York for a 'living wage'
When Border Searches Become Unreasonable
Draghi-Weidmann fight intensifies as ECB debates action
More Fast and Furious guns surface at crimes in Mexico
How A Teacher Made $1 Million Selling Lesson Plans
Egypt battles energy crunch with ban on too-cold air conditioners
Son of legendary Chinese Communist military leader apologizes for Cultural Revolution