
“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
Related posts:
Germany: Facebook must destroy facial recognition database
Pakistan TV preacher defends Ramadan baby give-away
Australia scraps plan to filter Internet
St. Louis: Bitcoin Accepted Here
Mitt Romney Says He Could Wage War on Iran Without Congress' Approval
Nazi hunters call on Twitter to crack down on terrorists
Pregnant Sudanese Christian sentenced to die for refusing to convert
French capital flight spikes as Hollande hits business
Obama Hints At Military Intervention In Syria
Who Could Be Watching You Watching Your Figure? Your Boss
Spaniards Fight to Get $10.3 Billion In Savings Back From Bank Investment Schemes
U.S. to provide ‘direct military support’ to Syrian rebels
Rising incomes fuel India’s growing appetite for meat
Julian Assange calls WikiLeaks movie a ‘massive propaganda attack’
Russia to Tighten ‘Anti-Terrorism’ Internet Rules