
“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
America's 14 Most Pissed-Off Comments on the TSA's Airport Body Scanners
South Korean Activists Send Leaflets to North Korea
Feds to return $107K they seized from NC business owner
Senate committee chair: U.S. will likely have more active military role in Mali
Venezuela's newest shortage: breast implants
Woman Wants Possessions Back After Bank Repossessed Wrong House
Son Skips Church, Father Arrested for Child Endangerment
Budget analysts project $1.1T federal deficit this year
Janet Yellen confirmed as head of Federal Reserve
Cyprus lifts all capital controls as banks recover
Tobacco, booze, now sugar: the control freaks happily ban everything
Why So Many Swiss Binationals Are Giving Up U.S. Citizenship
China promises bank rescue in next crisis
One man's ObamaCare nightmare
Former CEO reveals Blackwater worked as ‘virtual extension of the CIA’