“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
Related posts:
Puerto Rico Defaults On Bonds: Return Does Not Come Without Risk
JPMorgan: China's Potential Capital Outflows 'Practically Boundless'
Lord Rothschild takes £130m bet against the euro
Millions missing after party-loving mayor went on the run
Fox 25 Covers Consumer Concerns About Driver’s License Scanning
CNBC: Bitcoin Bonanza
Alaskan town home to airport with no planes and harbor with no road
Dell's Cash Overseas Is Needed at Home, But U.S. Taxes Loom Large
Quality the priority over timing for Yangon Stock Exchange opening
DreamWorks plans $3.2 billion China tourist attraction
NSA promises transparency by launching new Tumblr blog
911 Dispatcher Tells Sexual Assault Victim No Cops Will Help Her Due To Budget Cuts
Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion on Obama family last year, perks questioned in new book
Why parents are more paranoid than ever
Aide to man with Down syndrome killed by police in theater had warned police, report says