“The way we’re encouraged to cope with this is to make it about privacy: to turn inwards, take stock of our personal inner domain, and decide just how much of our lives can be offered up to the state. Large scale, bureaucratic intrusion into our personal lives is a given, but we can fill out a customer response card if we have any comments about the degree of the intrusion. If this is about privacy, the onus is on us to define its limits, to guide our servant institutions to the right policies that will protect our newly cordoned-off personal space. And so they invent a clever distraction about what the limits of privacy should be.”
Related posts:
A Commissarina Rises: Wendy J. Olson's Reign of Terror
How Empires End
The Logic of the Police State
Surrendering U.S. Citizenship Over New Banking Regulation?
The Egyptian Debacle
My Journey in the World of Copyrights
Cowardice Redefined: The New Face of American Serial Killers
ICANN: How top-down ‘implementation’ replaced bottom-up policymaking
School Has Become Too Hostile to Boys
Why I Charge $1,000 For An Hour Of My Time
The Wolf and the Lamb - David Galland
This failure rate will shock you
Indian central bank has debased the rupee 99% vs the dollar; no hope in next Guv too
U.S. Prisons Thriving on Jim Crow Marijuana Arrests
Living the Lockdown Life