“Recent developments in Egypt–with a sizeable minority of the population justifiably concerned about their rights at the hands of the majority of fundamentalist Islamists—show that arriving at liberal democracy from democracy may be a difficult and destabilizing prospect. The lesson from this messy process is not that the United States should intervene and remain until liberal democracies take hold in developing nations, but that the process is so chaotic that the United States should stay out of these nations, especially in the Middle East. This recommendation will be hard for the government of a swaggering superpower to stomach.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4661
Related posts:
Ron Paul: If You Like The Surveillance State, You’ll Love E-Verify
Glenn Greenwald: Andrew Sullivan, terrorism, and the art of distortion
Jim Rogers: Need to own real assets in India
Might India Confiscate the Gold of the Temples?
Peter, Put Away Your Sword
Congress Should Veto Obama's War
Almost Every Passenger on Indian Flight Found Carrying 1kg of Gold
Why the Surveillance State is Dangerous
What Actually Is or Will Be Obama's Foreign Policies in the Vampire-Empire?
Ron Paul on Obama's Syria WMD Claim
Expansion of Directed History: Now UN General Assembly to Act on Syrian Overthrow
The Wrong and Right Way to Buy Gold, Part III
Jacob Hornberger: Regime Change is the Root of Evil in Syria
Europe’s Pain is the World’s Gain
Alan Grayson unloads on “warmongering” and “hubris”
