
“One of the assurances I keep hearing about the U.S. government’s spying on American citizens is that it’s only used in cases of terrorism. Terrorism is, of course, an extraordinary crime, and its horrific nature is supposed to justify permitting all sorts of excesses to prevent it. But there’s a problem with this line of reasoning: mission creep. The definitions of ‘terrorism’ and ‘weapon of mass destruction’ are broadening, and these extraordinary powers are being used, and will continue to be used, for crimes other than terrorism. Even as the definition of terrorism broadens, we have to ask how far we will extend that arbitrary line.”
Related posts:
Michel Chossudovsky: US controlling both sides of Egypt coup
The Fed Chairs Have a Habit of Hazing
The Consequence of Complacency Is Catastrophe
"We're Really Not Apologetic" for two killings, say Texas' Airborne Snipers
Frank Lautenberg's Widow Reaps $174,000 In Senate Budget Bill
ASICMiner Stock Price Rises From 0.1 To Over 2 Bitcoins Per Share
Inside the Chinese Bitcoin Mine That's Making $1.5M a Month
Goldman Predicts More Gold Manipulation?
Social Security data of 13,000 health care workers mistakenly posted online for 9 days
European Parliament votes to suspend US SWIFT data exchange
Obama: Our ideals and principles, national security at stake in Syria
Former East German secret police captain says NSA spying ‘a dream come true’
Someone Is Lying
Papers Please: TSA-Style Checkpoints at UK Bus & Train Stations
Night of Clarity 2013 in Nashville