
“One of the assurances I keep hearing about the U.S. government’s spying on American citizens is that it’s only used in cases of terrorism. Terrorism is, of course, an extraordinary crime, and its horrific nature is supposed to justify permitting all sorts of excesses to prevent it. But there’s a problem with this line of reasoning: mission creep. The definitions of ‘terrorism’ and ‘weapon of mass destruction’ are broadening, and these extraordinary powers are being used, and will continue to be used, for crimes other than terrorism. Even as the definition of terrorism broadens, we have to ask how far we will extend that arbitrary line.”
Related posts:
Court Grants Order to Freeze Hashfast’s Bitcoin Wallets
Double taxation row as Brussels unveils new financial transactions tax
UN Commission Investigator: It Was The Syrian Rebels Who Used Sarin
Google and Viacom Settle YouTube Lawsuit After $100 Million Defense
Louisiana prison official: Raped 14-year-old inmate was no ‘Little Miss Muffin’
Some Private Sector Contestants for the U.S. vs U.K. Stupidity Contest
Judge blasts FBI for bugging courthouse, throws out 200 hours of recordings
NSA, the secret AT&T spy room, and 2 Israeli companies
Ron Paul: People Suffer and Die and then You Wonder Why They Get Mad at Us?
US Begins Verifying Passports On Departing International Flights
MP3tunes and its founder liable for $63 million in EMI copyright suit
‘Dorner’s Last Stand’ game surfaces as protesters decry LAPD brutality
Mob Violence and Mistaken Identity
Inside Barcelona's Bitcoin Drug Lab
Kids, Chores, and Bitcoin