“One of the assurances I keep hearing about the U.S. government’s spying on American citizens is that it’s only used in cases of terrorism. Terrorism is, of course, an extraordinary crime, and its horrific nature is supposed to justify permitting all sorts of excesses to prevent it. But there’s a problem with this line of reasoning: mission creep. The definitions of ‘terrorism’ and ‘weapon of mass destruction’ are broadening, and these extraordinary powers are being used, and will continue to be used, for crimes other than terrorism. Even as the definition of terrorism broadens, we have to ask how far we will extend that arbitrary line.”
Related posts:
Stock Market Guru Cody Willard Is Buying Precious Metals Coins.
Easy permanent residence with Panama Friendly Nations visa
Persian Handmade Shoes: Why Bitcoin
Tiny California Towns Have Big Asset Forfeiture Histories
British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting in Syria
SpyFiles 3: A growing surveillance industry amidst government inaction
Lead bullets for artists in Buenos Aires
What’s the Difference Between Romneycare and Obamacare?
New Mexico's Torture State
WeChat introduces gold-backed mobile micropayments in China
Ron Paul: Feds shouldn't 'interfere' with bitcoin
Ukraine Security Chief Blasted for Targeting Jews
7 Years of Work on Food Forest Destroyed Over Permit
Bitcoin Hardware Wallet: Alpha Software Demonstration
New York: Judge Rules Careful Driving Is Not A Crime