“These forfeitures and the partnerships between municipal police and federal agencies rose as the economy of California slid into a slump. Forfeitures through the federal Equitable Sharing Program have tripled while forfeitures using the state’s process have remained flat (and much lower). The reason is pretty simple: California’s asset forfeiture law allows law enforcement agencies to keep only a maximum of 65 percent of the money they seize. The federal program allows law enforcement agencies to keep 80 percent. Some cities appear to be anticipating forfeiture revenue in advance and using forfeited funds to supplant budgeted spending for law enforcement agencies.”
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/21/tiny-california-towns-have-big-asset-for
Related posts:
Shield Mutual: Adam Kokesh Legal Defense Fund Update
When You Receive Your “Policy Cancelled” Letter, What Then?
Economist Recommends 'E-Dollar' That Loses 5% Of Its Value Per Year
Glenn Greenwald: Bradley Manning: the face of heroism
40% of U.S. on Benefits; More Receive Benefits Than Full-Time-Employed
Obamacare Putting Millions Of Part-Time Workers At Risk Of Seeing Cut Hours
Fed’s Zero Interest Rate Cost Savers A Trillion Dollars
BTCTurk becomes the first Turkish lira-to-bitcoin exchange
Nomura "Sincerely Apologizes" For Blowing Up Investors
Mark Nestmann: They’ve spit on the Bill of Rights yet again
Arkansas mayor fires rifle seized by police, shattering city hall window
Inhofe seeks hearings addressing the EPA's monstrous "illegal human experiments"
Max Keiser Interviews Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed
Greek Men On 'Lagarde List' Found Dead
Krugman: "The Employment Story is Highly Unimpressive"