“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
KFC and Pizza Hut closed in Nepal as staff threatens to kill branch managers
Marc Faber: S&P 500 Could Fall 20% to 30%
Who funds Syrian rebel advocate O’Bagy and her 'Task Force'? You do
Fed Williams: QE3 asset purchases may be expanded
The Top 10 Companies With The Best Business Outlook According To Employees
Greenspan Sees Turmoil as QE Boost to Markets Unwinds
Special Forces axe their plan to infiltrate Utah after locals complain about exercise 'imposing mart...
Criminalizing Photography
Wholesale Prices in U.S. Climb by Most in a Year; Food Prices Surge
Google plans drone delivery service for 2017
SecondMarket Seeks to Open Bitcoin Fund to Ordinary Investors
Former FBI agent pleads guilty to leaking secrets to the Associated Press
Russian lawmaker: Snowden agrees to Venezuela offer of asylum
With Montana’s Lead, States May Demand Warrants for Cellphone Data
Marijuana stops child's severe seizures