“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
John Paulson: Puerto Rico Is Now 'Singapore of the Caribbean'
PetroChina to join Exxon on giant Iraqi oilfield
China Eclipses U.S. as Biggest Trading Nation
US ramps up Iraq air strikes in support of Kurdish attack on key dam
A Rich Fantasy Life: Sports Fans Dream of Making a Living Off Games
Health care law's tax hikes are coming: Who pays?
Use commemorative coins to pay down deficit, lawmakers suggest
US 'told Syria rebels' to seek intervention
John Kerry: Science on climate change is ‘irrefutable and it is alarming’
Musharraf says blasphemy law cannot be changed (2011)
To Save the King of the Jungle, a Call to Pen Him In
Two years after Mubarak, his prison torture apparatus still wounds Egypt
Wary eyes shift to the skies as unmanned aircraft are tested in Oklahoma
Realtor.com: Will You Be Buying Your Next House With Bitcoins?
9 foreign countries where you can use U.S. dollars
