“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
How did a modern feminist become a brutal dictator's wife?
Court won't hear appeal over TSA scanners
Western Investors Cash in on Chinese Surveillance Program Targeting Muslims For 'Re-Education'
Bitcoin endorsed by top hedge fund manager
Fed Balance Sheet Hits Record $3 Trillion
Border Patrol agent who shot Mexican teenager dead will not be charged
Police Chief Caught On Video Assaulting Shackled Inmate
Another Chinese Firm Defaults on Its Dollar Bond
White House dodges questions of Egyptian ‘coup’ as military aid continues
UN orders its inspectors out of Syria over fears of U.S. air strike
IMF sees no end to French jobless crisis this decade
Evaluating Drug Decriminalization in Portugal 12 Years Later
Virginia State Trooper inattentively plows into skateboarder, beats hasty exit
Zurich bank cuts Cuba's last Swiss franc channel
Bond Funds Lose $30.3 Billion in August in Big ‘Shift’
