“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Government shutdown is not a tax holiday: Taxes still due Oct. 15th
German court rules that ECB's 2012 bond-buying plan is legal
A radical dream for making techno utopias a reality
Study: Democracy in decline around the world
Costa Rica Probes Liberty Reserve Founder Marriage
Bitcoin on BBC Newsnight - 26/03/2013
France backs action on Syria as U.S. seeks coalition
Anti-anxiety drug pollution makes fish fearless and antisocial
'There is no hiding place... our bombs will kill people': Jeremy Corbyn
Wall Street Predicts $50 Billion Bill to Settle U.S. Mortgage Suits
Basta 'La Casta': No End in Sight to Italy's Economic Decline
Criminal defense lawyers demand access to secret DEA evidence
Homebuilder helping Millennials trade student loan debt for house debt
Dow hits 15000, but percentage of Americans owning stocks hits a low
Lawyer arrested for advising stranger of his constitutional rights awarded $43,000
