“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Nine charged for giving food to homeless in California
No more beauty contests for kids in France
China currency devaluation hits stocks; dollar gains on currency war fears
BMC Software loses $13 million to IRS after repatriating $717.2 million
Supreme Court rules generic drug makers cannot be held liable for defects
Officer admits she didn’t write down ‘snowball’ in weapons charge
Trump will arm Syrian Kurds to fight ISIS, over Turkey’s fierce objections
What we know thanks to Bradley Mannning’s leaks to WikiLeaks
Idea of Euro Exit Finds Currency in Portugal
Cuba to eliminate currency pegged to dollar
Police issue warning over new Canadian bank notes as counterfeits flood in
Developers Turn Former Office Buildings Into High-End Apartments
King County sheriff’s deputy fired over threats to news editor
Former CEO reveals Blackwater worked as ‘virtual extension of the CIA’
E-ppointments
