“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Americans in Canada can face complex tax situation
Swiss wildlife officer convicted of poaching 131 animals
Kansas rallies behind teacher facing deportation after 30+ years
Students arrested for throwing spitballs, lollipops
Bond Damage Tally: $430 Billion Lost as Slump Put in Perspective
Iraq attacks kill 39 as official escapes assassination
British warships arrive in Gibraltar amid tension with Spain
Swiss luxury home market turns downward
After the Manning verdict, four big issues remain untouched
Coinbase Raises $25 Million From Andreessen Horowitz
N.H. City Wants a "Tank" to Use Against Occupiers and Libertarians
Caught On Camera: Woman Goes Into Cardiac Arrest During Traffic Stop
Mandarin Chinese Becomes New Language in the Classroom
Report: NSA Mimics Google to Monitor "Target" Web Users
Hong Kong Billionaire Brothers Give $350 Million To Harvard University
