“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Obama’s inauguration committee to accept corporate cash
Hedge funds selling gold 'in a big way'
Woman scams metal buyers out of thousands with fake silver bars
The ‘sharp decline’ in U.S unemployment was actually a glitch
The Bacteria Babies Need
U.S. Army Opens Bids To Buy $7 Billion In Renewable Energy
EBay considering accepting bitcoin as payment
Prison time for former cop trafficking in steroids
Police Taser Gun Rights Advocate at Anti-Gun Violence Rally
How Laura Poitras Helped Snowden Spill His Secrets
Deportations of fathers begin under Trump executive order
How a gov. spelling mistake bankrupted a 134-year-old family business
Minnesota farmer cleared by jury in raw milk case
Death Of The S Corp As A Tax Election?
UnitedHealth warns it may exit Obamacare plans