“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
New law forces Little League chapter to pay for concession stand permit
Al-Qaeda-linked force captures Fallujah amid rise in violence in Iraq
Republicans Move Convention Delegate Vote To Time With No TV Coverage To Hide Ron Paul
India launches first of seven navigation satellites
Russia Mulls 'Limitations' On FATCA Information Exchange With U.S.
Joe Biden runs up bill of $585,000 in taxpayer funds for just ONE NIGHT in five-star Paris hotel
Russia said to plan to deliver Snowden for execution in exchange for lifting sanctions
America's 14 Most Pissed-Off Comments on the TSA's Airport Body Scanners
World anti-doping agency wants a larger budget from national governments
The War On Terror Has Cost Taxpayers $1.7 Trillion
Rand Paul on CNN speaks against possible Syria strike 8/30/13
British Judge Upholds Warrant for Assange For Fleeing From Dropped Charges
26 Years of Growth: Shanghai Then and Now
New bitcoin billing platform rolled out to marijuana dispensaries
Bitcoin Crime Risk Sparks Warning at Top Nordic Forex Bank
