
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
When in Rome
Cops Break Into Innocent Man’s Home, Taser Him to Death in the Shower
Legalization of Pot Means Trouble for Private Prisons
FreeSpeechMe: Anti-Censorship and Secure Domain Resolving Plug-in
Jury Nullification Victory For New Jersey Weedman
Israeli security strip searches Arab journalist at U.S. July Fourth party
Jeffrey Tucker: How Bitcoin is Reinventing The Monetary System
NSA combining national ID cards, Internet intercepts, facial databases
TechCrunch Founder: The Department Of Homeland Security Stole My Boat Today
Senator Patrick Leahy: ‘Our law is clear,’ U.S. must cut off aid to Egypt
Pat Buchanan: What Is America’s Mission Now?
Mexico's audit office tells Bank of Mexico to verify gold held at Bank of England
'Florida's Dirtiest Cop' Charged With Kidnapping Man Who Wanted To File Brutality Complaint
Cash House Sales Rising in U.S. Despite Stable Mortgage Market
Major Cloudflare bug leaked sensitive data from customers’ websites