
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Bitcoin Baron Keeps a Secretive Open Source OS Alive
Should Cities Be in the Business of Issuing Debit Cards? [2013]
Democratic senator votes against CIA nominee: Too many Bush-era policies continue
Adam Kokesh Blog Statement On Arrest
"Polish" Death Camps and Censorship's Unintended Consequences
Do Not Look to Politics to Remedy NSA Overreach
Nigel Farage: EU wants to steal money from Cypriots bank accounts
Lawsuit Exposes Google’s Internal Culture of Intolerance
Kansas City, Missouri Makes Red Light Running a Parking Violation
US National Debt Since 1977 By Congressional Composition
Reflecting On Traveling Around The World: The Reunion
NJ Supreme Court Says Judges Can't Do Stand Up Comedy
"Czars" No More: New Mexico Bans Policing for Profit
Russia And China Sign Historic $400 Billion "Holy Grail" Gas Deal
Obama Rep. Schultz on The NDAA and Secret Kill List