
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Cyprus Depositor Bail-In Set At 47.5%
Bill Gates funds scheme to spray artificial 'planet-cooling' sulfur particles into atmosphere
Colorado, Oregon, Washington or … Uruguay, who will be first?
The War on Drugs, 40 years later
Chick-fil-A to halt funding of anti-LGBT groups
California: Two More Cities Chose To End Red Light Camera Use
Secure Boot snafu: Microsoft leaks backdoor key, firmware flung wide open
Why Using Bitcoin Could Make a Target-Style Data Breach Obsolete
New Study Confirms CBD Blocks Opioid Reward, May Help Treat Addiction
The Best Jobs That Don't Require A College Degree
Carnage in Syria Courtesy of US Allies
Zimbabwe Bitcoin Exchange Ban Lifted After Central Bank Fails To Appear
Enemy at the gait: New cameras identify you by your walk
Greece’s New Finance Minister: Bitcoin ‘Highly Problematic Currency’
Which States Are Most Drunk on Wine Taxes?