
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Homelanders propose more tax hikes on U.S. Persons abroad
Lavabit chief predicts 'long fight' with feds (Q&A)
New York to Tokyo in two hours
Must-read letter to the President
Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Drug Stop For Legally Tinted Windows
Keiser Report: Pickpockets Rule UK?
Breaking: CoinEx.pw hacked, all coins stolen
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
Obama Meets Privately with Energy Industry CEOs
U.S. survey data casts doubt on classification of psychedelics as ‘dangerous’
US Military Fills Social Networks With Fake Sock Puppet Accounts [2011]
Julian Assange Praised the Paul Family, But He's Only Half Right
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Which Country Has the Most Expensive Bureaucrats of All?
US government: We can jail you indefinitely for not decrypting your data
$200 to set up a lemonade stand in Illinois is 'insane': senator