
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Foreign Governments and Congress Have Scrapped the 10th Amendment
Bitcoin broker Coinbase booked $1 billion in revenue last year, IPO rumored
Woman Calls Suicide Hotline for Boyfriend. Cops Arrive, Kill Him.
Ron Paul Unfiltered; Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg takes on the NSA
Why you’re likely exposed to one of the dumbest investments in history
Fed Warns of 'Escalating Threats' to U.S. Payment System
Sign language-to-speech translating gloves take out Microsoft Imagine Cup 2012
Will Judge Napolitano Run for President in 2016?
Police Cruiser Slams Into Couple On Bike, Couple Flies Over Trooper's Car
NSA Taps Directly Into Undersea Fiber-optic Data Cables
Blocked at U.S. border, Canadian expat lives out of his car in South Surrey
The People's Republic of California is Sinking
Government Attempts to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Wrongful Arrest, Psych Ward Detention of Facebook Marine
$90 million spent on now-abandoned Maryland Obamacare exchange
Judge Napolitano on the Virtues of Private Justice