“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
The Real Reason for the Iraq War
The United States Plummets to 18th in New Economic Freedom of the World Rankings
Who is the real big bucks bully in the gun control debate?
Why Trust in Government is at All Time Lows, and Why That’s a Good Thing
The Technological Evolution of Nonlethal Weaponry
How to Defeat CISPA Once And For All!
Latin America Says ‘Adiós’ to the Populist Left
Why So Many Cambodians Own Donut Shops
Russia To West: We Told You Not To Overthrow Qaddafi!
Gold’s Protective Power In Action: India’s Ongoing Currency Destruction
Glenn Greenwald: U.S. should be ‘on its knees begging’ that nothing happens to Snowden
Florida man arrested for ‘molesting a manatee’
Brooklyn pot dealer donates proceeds to hurricane survivors
The police state isn't coming – it's here
Cruelty and Criminality Combine in the Vernal, Utah Police Department