“What Barack Obama, Mike Rogers, Peter King, and their ilk mean when they tell us that ‘we’ need to find the right balance between security and privacy is that they will dictate to us what the alleged balance will be. We will have no real say in the matter, and they can be counted on to find the balance on the ‘security’ side of the spectrum as suits their interests. Of course, our rulers can’t really set things to the security side of the spectrum because the game is rigged. When we give up privacy — or, rather, when our rulers take it — we don’t get security in return; we get a more intrusive state, which means we get more insecurity.”
(Visited 23 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
For those concerned about the Voting Rights Act
Who Wants War with Syria?
From the IRS to the EPA?
U.S. 10 Year Bond Yields in Perspective (1790-Present)
Iran, Russia Launching Cryptos to Escape Sanctions
What Happens When You Tell Indians to Stop Buying Gold
What five beers account for most emergency room visits?
The Vlad and Donald Show – A Glorious Blow for Peace
Government, Stop Trying to "Help" Uber
Anthony Gregory: What Is the Threshold for Martial Law?
Jacob Hornberger: The Pentagon’s B-52 Message to North Koreans
Disaster in Watertown
Paul Craig Roberts: The Two Faux Democracies Threaten Life On Earth
The “Moral Obscenity” of Washington’s Empire
The Cunningness of the CIA’s JFK Assassination Cover-Up