Anthony Gregory: What Is the Threshold for Martial Law?


“What if a future suspect implicated in a gruesome and dramatic criminal act next year manages to escape justice for months? Can the police now just shut down cities, transportation, and—as they did on Monday*—cell service for as long as they deem necessary? Should normal denizens really have no say of their own on whether they will risk the violent threats that might await them outside? If they have no right to walk about freely today without expecting, at a minimum, serious harassment from authorities, can the same be true on any other day? People tolerate extreme police powers when they seem temporary. But what if the emergency persists?”

Related posts:

Gentlemen, Start Your Presses
Andrew P. Napolitano: More Holes in the Fourth Amendment
What Level of Taxation Is Too Much?
Krugman thinks low interest rates are behind the boom in paper currency. Not so fast!
Guilty of Aiding the American People
There is no terrorist threat: The feds want you to think there is
Eric Margolis: Kicking Sand In Russia's Face
Biden’s and Carney’s Vacuous Justifications for Bombing Syria
Housing Recovery Mirage Over; Bernanke Hoping to Retire Before It's Noticed
Is the U.S. the World’s Moral Authority as Obama Thinks?
Media Seeks Answers To General Solicitation
Bitcoin is going mainstream. Here is why cypherpunks shouldn’t worry.
The UK Recovery that Isn't ... the Market Recovery that Is
Bill Bonner: Why Democrats are Plotting Against Obamacare
The Veterans Administration: News Cycle vs. Spin Cycle