Anthony Gregory: What Is the Threshold for Martial Law?


“What if a future suspect implicated in a gruesome and dramatic criminal act next year manages to escape justice for months? Can the police now just shut down cities, transportation, and—as they did on Monday*—cell service for as long as they deem necessary? Should normal denizens really have no say of their own on whether they will risk the violent threats that might await them outside? If they have no right to walk about freely today without expecting, at a minimum, serious harassment from authorities, can the same be true on any other day? People tolerate extreme police powers when they seem temporary. But what if the emergency persists?”

Related posts:

US Pivot to Asia Promises More of the Same - Ivan Eland
Prohibitionists Respond to Repeal: Bootlegging, Racketeering, and Kidnapping Will Go Up Now!
Chinese Women Aren’t Taking Buffett’s Advice on Gold
NSA Snooping on Americans Is Unconstitutional and Outrageous
Syria charade: West bent on war, UN investigation meaningless
Hollande Undeterred By UK: "France Will Participate. It Is Ready" For Syria
Jeffrey Tucker: How to Fake a Fast Food Strike
Peter Schiff: Gold Will Have Its Day
Jeffrey Tucker: Has the Fed Met Its Match?
Extraordinary Directed History of the WTO Trade Breakthrough
Fed Money Pumping Brings Results: The Affluent Society Returns
After 50 Years, Washington Has Lost the War on Poverty
The World’s Biggest Economic Fallacies… and How to Profit From Them
NSA Cheerleaders Discover Value of Privacy Only When Their Own Is Violated
Jacob Hornberger: Gun Control? What About U.S. Arms Sales?