“Starting in 1935 in Indiana, U.S. states started altering their laws to abolish the action for breach of promise. Women responded, by Brinig’s account, by requiring a down payment from their fiancees in the form of an expensive ring—which forfeited if the fiancee terminated the engagement. Think of it as a performance bond. Brinig looked at data on diamond imports and concluded that the demand for diamonds started to rise about 1935, four years before the Ayer marketing campaign that is usually given credit for creating the demand for engagement rings. The evidence also suggested that the custom began declining once premarital sex became widely accepted.”
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/2013/08/diamonds-advertising-debeers-and-sex.html
Related posts:
Jeffrey Tucker: Why Imagining Freedom Is Essential
Jacob Hornberger: U.S. Soldiers Died for Empire and Hegemony
The Forfeiture Curmudgeons
Jacob Hornberger: The Real Criminals Under Our National-Security State System
Bill Bonner: The Real Reason American Capitalism Is Failing
Money Down a Rathole: College, Healthcare, Housing
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
It's Not "If;" It's "When"
Whom would you HIRE to intervene in Syria?
1971: The Year That Nixon Chose Gold Over Paper
Ron Paul on the Evolution of Freedom in the 21st Century
Tragedy of the Commons and Species Extinction
The Odyssey of Sound Economics
John Hussman: A Warning from Graham and Dodd
Bitcoin's dilemma: go mainstream, or stay radical?