“Starting in 1935 in Indiana, U.S. states started altering their laws to abolish the action for breach of promise. Women responded, by Brinig’s account, by requiring a down payment from their fiancees in the form of an expensive ring—which forfeited if the fiancee terminated the engagement. Think of it as a performance bond. Brinig looked at data on diamond imports and concluded that the demand for diamonds started to rise about 1935, four years before the Ayer marketing campaign that is usually given credit for creating the demand for engagement rings. The evidence also suggested that the custom began declining once premarital sex became widely accepted.”
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/2013/08/diamonds-advertising-debeers-and-sex.html
Related posts:
What Happens When You Can't Believe A Thing The President Says?
Satoshi’s Genius: How Bitcoin Dodged Some Cryptographic Bullets
The Real State Secret: Spies Aren't Very Good At Their Jobs
David Galland: Scenarios
Obama Agrees with Hitler on Schooling Children
David Galland: Toad Tossing
Timing the Collapse: Ron Paul Says Watch the Petrodollar
Carlo Ponzi, Alias Uncle Sam
US Government “Protection” of Al-Qaeda Terrorists and the US-Saudi “Black Hole”
Central Planning by Central Bankers
The IMF, the SDR, and the Dollar: One Big Happy
Will Grigg: The Protected Predator Class
The Latest Bubble to Pop: Mortgage Refinancings
The Imaginary Trial of Dietrich Schmoller
Does “Homeland Security” really protect you?