“Starting in 1935 in Indiana, U.S. states started altering their laws to abolish the action for breach of promise. Women responded, by Brinig’s account, by requiring a down payment from their fiancees in the form of an expensive ring—which forfeited if the fiancee terminated the engagement. Think of it as a performance bond. Brinig looked at data on diamond imports and concluded that the demand for diamonds started to rise about 1935, four years before the Ayer marketing campaign that is usually given credit for creating the demand for engagement rings. The evidence also suggested that the custom began declining once premarital sex became widely accepted.”
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/2013/08/diamonds-advertising-debeers-and-sex.html
Related posts:
The Real Reason Governments Are Killing Financial Privacy
Stefan Molyneux: Finding Your Tribe
Agorism and Nazism: A Study in Polar Opposites
Will Grigg: The Triumph of the Reich-Publican Party
Living the Lockdown Life
The Government’s Us? Not Last Time I Checked
Dealing with Cops These Days
Obama's abuse of the Espionage Act is modern-day McCarthyism
David Galland: The New Stoics
A $100k earner gets to keep $99k in Singapore but $57k in San Francisco
There Will Be No Economic Recovery. Prepare Yourself Accordingly.
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
FDR Spied on Leonard Read
Andrew J. Bacevich: A Letter to Paul Wolfowitz
Stanford Seminar - BTC: Bitcoin, a New Value Chain in China