“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
The Silent Republicans
Obama’s Next Big Blunder
Germany’s Hitler-Era Homeschool Laws Still In (Brute) Force
Walter Williams: Black Self-Sabotage
Pardon Me? It isn’t Snowden Who Needs Clemency
Faber's 'Fed Counterfeiting' Remark is Unusual but Not Extreme These Days
Passing Over Eisenhower
Google Bus Hate: Give It a Rest
Can You Trust the Case for War this Time?
Jim Rogers on Politics, Money Metals and How to Deal With an Endless Downturn
The NSA is giving your phone records to the DEA. And the DEA is covering it up.
Pat Buchanan: Too Many Wars. Too Many Enemies.
Abolish ICE
Would You Vote for This Guy?
Bill Bonner: The Opportunity of a Lifetime – In Real Estate