“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
Enhance Public Safety: Disarm the Police!
US Pivot to Asia Promises More of the Same - Ivan Eland
Obama Meets Security Advisors Over "Most Specific, Credible Terrorist Threat In Years"; US Forces On...
Is the lawlessness of Obama's drone policy coming home?
Fred Reed: Government Can't Protect Us From Terrorism
The Disappearing Gold
ObamaCare Is Just a Stepping Stone to Nationalized Health Care
Westerners Kidnapped in North Africa — but Is France the Real Target?
Bahrain, a Brutal U.S. Ally
Federal judge says St. Louis police targeted protesters for retaliation
College Girls, Bottled Water and the Emerging American Police State
Andrew Napolitano: Domestic Spying Is Dangerous to Freedom
Judge Napolitano On Why You Should Be Upset About Govt Requesting Record Amount of Google Email Data
The Right Response to Trump’s Tough Trade Talk? Ignore It.
The Treasury Payoff
