“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
The Pantheon
Obama: A Keynesian, Not a Communist
A War On Opioids Is A War On Suffering People
Peter Schiff on Politics, Precious Metals and President Obama's Second Term
'Are We Rome?’ Was A Questioned Asked and Answered Long Ago
Jim Rogers: 'Run for the Hills' Now, I'm Doing It
Can You Trust the Case for War this Time?
Bill Bonner: What does real estate want to do?
Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Is Driving The World To The Final War
Super-Mario's new dawn
Jacob Hornberger: The Deep State Went After JFK on Russia Too
Germany will think twice before saving France next time
John Hussman: Air-Pockets, Free-Falls, and Crashes
DetroitCoin: Why we should make Detroit into a Bitcoin Hub
Paul Craig Roberts: “The world will not survive the neoconservatives' doctrine”
