“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
(Visited 23 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Obama's Hammer and the Progress of The Daily Bell
Bill Bonner: 'Return to Zombieland'
The Cannabis Conspiracy?
Deja Vu: The Fed's Real "Policy Error" Was To Encourage Years of Speculation
Peter Schiff: Gold & The Perfect Storm That Will Lead To Collapse
Jacob Hornberger: Keep It Shut Down!
Wrongfully Imprisoned for 31 Years, and This is Considered Justice?
NSA Snooping on Americans Is Unconstitutional and Outrageous
Bill Bonner: The Housing Rebound Story Is a Fraud
Never Mind the Wall—They’re Building Warehouses for Immigrant Children
Five Truths About Public Employee Pensions
Gold: Fear vs. Greed – and Taxes [Bullish]
Why Isn't The Murder Of An American Boy An Impeachable Offense?
What five beers account for most emergency room visits?
Paul Craig Roberts: Sanctions and Airliners