“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
Jeffrey Tucker: The War Is On You
Ron Paul: Why Won’t They Tell Us the Truth About NSA Spying?
Eric Margolis: The Road To Nowhere – Kerry Mideast Journey
Silver Set to Double, According to… Apple?
The Absurdist, Tragicomic Narratives of Domestic Surveillance
The Police State Programs Not Affected by a Government Shutdown
Quagmires Are Often Just a Few Steps Away
A Jail for Children
The Liberator 3D Printed Gun Successfully Smuggled Through International Transport Security
Greenwald: ACLU Attacked for Defending Neo-Nazis’ Free Speech Rights
How Many Muslims in the World? How Many Muslim Terrorists?
Chauvinists and Other Anti-Peace Voices
How Will White House Find Legal Grounds to Bomb Syria?
Will Globalism Invade the US via its Cities? The Daily Beast Thinks So
Glenn Greenwald: The personal side of taking on the NSA