“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
India's falling GDP growth, financial inclusion and likely impact on Gold
Guantanamo Bay: The Model for an American Police State?
The S&P's Tragic Rise Will Continue
The Smart Money is Investing Here…
How Do You Like Your Central Planners, Bookish or Flamboyant?
Can We Envision a World without a Central Bank?
Ensuring the Boundaries of Truth
Bitcoin: Hoping for the Best After Bernanke's Endorsement
How Responsible Is Obama for the Oklahoma Killing?
Quagmires Are Often Just a Few Steps Away
The Secret to Picking Winners in ‘Submerging Markets’
Bill Bonner: What if Mr. Summers weren't so brilliant, after all?
Ron Paul: US Government Views You And Me As The Enemy
Traveling on a Revoked Passport…What Can You Do Next?
Thou Shalt Not Torture -- Without the State's Permission
