“Carney has another vacuous justification: ‘…allowing the use of chemical weapons on a significant scale to take place without a response would represent a significant challenge or threat to the United States’ security interests.’ This is more than empty. It’s crazy. Syria is absolutely rent by a horrible civil war. There is no way that it represents a challenge to the security interests of the U.S., much less a significant challenge. The U.S. government is itself endangering peace and risking a wider war if it attacks Syria. This lowers the security of Americans. I’ve located 3 elaborations of what these supposed security interests might be.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bidens-and-carneys-vacuous-justifications-for-bombing-syria/
Related posts:
Jobless Jokes
Washington may have had a hand in halting Dow meltdown
Ron Paul: Iraq, The 'Liberation' Neocons Would Rather Forget
Jacob Hornberger: The JFK Autopsy Cover-Up
Wendy McElroy: Print Me A Revolution
Report on CIA Torture Methods and Renditions
Bill Bonner: Stay Away from Obama’s MyRAs…
FT 'Explains' the Decline and Fall of the West
Central Bank Snuffs Out Vietnam’s Thriving Gold Market
The US Uses Gas To Kill Civilians
Hackers Can Use Your Car to Kill You
Tax Hikers Are Getting More Open about Targeting the Middle Class
Justin Raimondo: Is America a Free Country?
Why the Surveillance State is Dangerous
Jim Rogers ... Sign of the Times?
