“Carney has another vacuous justification: ‘…allowing the use of chemical weapons on a significant scale to take place without a response would represent a significant challenge or threat to the United States’ security interests.’ This is more than empty. It’s crazy. Syria is absolutely rent by a horrible civil war. There is no way that it represents a challenge to the security interests of the U.S., much less a significant challenge. The U.S. government is itself endangering peace and risking a wider war if it attacks Syria. This lowers the security of Americans. I’ve located 3 elaborations of what these supposed security interests might be.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bidens-and-carneys-vacuous-justifications-for-bombing-syria/
Related posts:
Detroit Bankruptcy: How to Fix Detroit in 6 Easy Steps
Doug Casey: Conspiracies, Gold and the Continuing 'Greater Depression'
Two Cheers for the Coming Collapse of the U.S. Economy!
Ron Paul: Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe
China remains the place you want to have some of your money invested
Bill Bonner: The Fed Was Right…
Rand Paul’s Misplaced Celebration
Whole Foods Co-CEO: Unintended Consequences in Health-Care Law
Skewed Rhetoric On Metals And Markets Obscures Best Plays
Syria charade: West bent on war, UN investigation meaningless
Obama Has a New 401(k) – Yours
The U.S.-Saudi Starvation Blockade
Smearing Glenn Greenwald: The Gregorian Connection
Just Wait Until Ferguson Police Get Federally Funded Drones
Bahrain, a Brutal U.S. Ally
