“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
This Trade Treaty Got Better when the US Bailed
Blind juggling robot keeps balls in the air for hours
Trump plans laptop, electronics ban on all flights from Europe
Congressman: Insurance Cancelation Letters Are “Transition Notices.”
Kansas Supreme Court Rules Passing Sobriety Test Is Meaningless
WikiLeaks: CIA wrote code 'to impersonate' Kaspersky Lab anti-virus
How it's going with the first Bitcoin restaurant in the Netherlands
Reality Check: 1 on 1 With President Obama, How Does He Justify A Kill List?
Aaron Swartz is Dead, Now White House Adjusts Rules
Dick Bove: US Assault on JPMorgan Is 'Coordinated from Above'
Daddy Bloomberg Wants to Require Retailers to Hide Tobacco
A Stainless Steel Bitcoin Wallet
Google confirms critical Android crypto flaw used in $5,700 Bitcoin heist
Florida education chief resigns after fixing charter school grades for GOP donor
The Road to World Government, World Police, World Tyranny