“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Impeachment: Congress Fires Opening Shot Across Obama’s Bow.
Western diplomats report Israel behind bogus Iran nuclear data leak
IRS Seized $17 Million From Innocent Business Owners Using Asset Forfeiture
Gold jewellery stocks hammered in India
Russia And China Sign Historic $400 Billion "Holy Grail" Gas Deal
Dronebusters: Turning Spy Drones into Barney Fife
What is Really Going on in Sweden?
US covertly built Twitter-like service to stir anti-Castro dissent
Broadcom chip bug opened 1 billion phones to a Wi-Fi-hopping worm attack
Your phone is a gateway for spying on you by anyone
Teen arrested for iPhone 'terrorism' at school faces 20 years in prison
Canadians Panic As Food Prices Soar On Collapsing Currency
CA Police Cuff Man Recording Them, Shoot His Dog, Leave It Writhing
US advisers urge Trump to refinance US debt by issuing 100-year bonds
National Bank of Canada foreclosing Americans’ homes over credit card debt