“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Two giant US pension funds admit there’s a BIG problem
Romney's Convention Power Play: Sununu Evades Ron Paul Delegates To Avoid Floor Fight
Russia's new Eurasian Economic Union could get its own single currency
Bill Kristol's Empire of Death
The Cloud Belongs to the NSA
150,000 Greek Public Sector Job Cuts Pending As Greece Launches Another Grexit "Plan B" Movement
Tennessee judge changes baby’s name after ruling it a conflict with her beliefs
Caymans win a free tax loophole in exchange for their FATCA signature
Firm says online gambling accounts for almost half of all Bitcoin transactions
Antigua set to bypass US copyright law with WTO green-lit media, software sales website
The "Be Very Afraid" Society
Perpetual Travel (PT) And Entrepreneurial Anonymity With Steve Michaels
Mentally disabled man playing with Legos fired upon by Seattle cop
French Anti-Uber Protest: Cabbies Burn Cars, Attack Uber Drivers
2013: Year Of The Bitcoin