“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
The DEA's $4 Billion Warrantless Cash Grab
Former Greek defense minister gets eight years and €500,000 fine over €100,000 in asset non-declarat...
Privacy protections booted from CISPA cybersecurity bill in closed-door hearing
US institutions to expats: 'Take your retirement account elsewhere – now'
'Asset forfeiture' laws designed to strip criminals of assets target innocent homeowners
Government foreclosure audit held off on looking at largest banks
Destroyer of Mankind Now a Museum Piece
The EU Robs the Bank In Cyprus - Coming to the USA Too?
Republicans to declare ‘We Built This!’ in stadium built with government funds
US Coast Guard Fires At Iranian Fishing Boat In Persian Gulf
Bitcoin becoming a standard part of lawsuit discovery requests?
Senate Tax Bill’s Marginal Rates Could Top 100% for Some
It’s Official: New OVDP program designed for Swiss Banks
“Russian Facebook” founder flees after refusing to turn over user data
Santa Monica residents push city council to rein in outdoors fitness classes