“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
19 Insane Tidbits From Ex-Employee's Lawsuit Against Google
Will ABC really tell us what happened at Waco in 1993?
Second California county joins push to form state of ‘Jefferson’
The Path to $10,000 an Ounce Gold, Revisited
Liberland: utopian tax-free micronation or state of mind?
Israel Airstrike on Syria: Strange Bedfellows?
Internment Camps: U. S. Government Field Manual
Does Facebook Help the Prosecution, But Not Defense?
Venezuela running out of toilet paper
France: Report Identifies Most Outrageous Speed Traps
Ben Swann and the Media's NDAA Problem
The “I Thought Bonds Were Safe” Fallacy…
Vigilante Detroit residents attack suspected rapist after police fail to act
City Forces Homeowner To Tear Out Garden, Grow Grass She's Allergic To
Justin Raimondo: Snowden a Hero to Americans