“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Officer Claims Cops Sell LAPD Guns to Civilians and Dealers
Torture Memo Author John Yoo: President Can Wage War Without Declaration
US Refines "Military Options" Ahead Of Syrian Strikes
Pirate Party Prompts Successful Campaign Finance Ruling for Bitcoin
New Possibilities in Panama: Panama's New Visa Offering
Why Congresscriminals Want to "Privatize" Rather Than Abolish the TSA
Hedge Fund Economist David Rosenberg Departs From Deflation Camp
Microsoft beats Google by adding Bitcoin currency conversion to Bing
Majority Views NSA Phone Tracking as Acceptable Anti-terror Tactic [2013]
Interview with Austin and Beccy of 'Life on Bitcoin' in Singapore
US Treasury denies it is trying to torpedo Bitcoin
Google confirms critical Android crypto flaw used in $5,700 Bitcoin heist
All About Bitcoin Mining: Road To Riches Or Fool's Gold?
US Army Tactical Manuals Describe How to Control Domestic Insurrection
The Similarity Between American & Iranian Media