“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Court: WiFi Sniffing Can Be Wiretapping Because WiFi Isn't Audio
Median Household Income Is Flat
Jeffrey Tucker on Bitcoin, Digital Anarchy, Socialists, Equality, and More
Making Heart Surgery Accessible to the Poor, by Embracing Mass Production
Annual Medicare Subsidy Per Enrolled Member, 2011: $12,000
The War on Money Laundering Is Causing the Wrong Kind of Casualties
The Most Powerful Bitcoin Miner In The World: KnC Jupiter
Jim Rogers: Higher Education And Finance Are Getting The Ax
MP3tunes and its founder liable for $63 million in EMI copyright suit
Why an Arms Control Pact Has Security Experts Up in Arms
Leaked Docs: Dutch Rabobank Blocked Bitcoin for ‘Ethical Reasons’
Overstock.com CEO Unveils More Details About Bitcoin Adoption
India's Cash Ban Leaves At Least 47 Dead, So Far
FDA urged to approve aspartame as hidden additive in milk products
Hackers selling access to airport security systems for $10