“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
What You Need To Know About The Liberator 3D-Printed Pistol
Shadowy federal agency snooping in your wallet
Keiser Report: Let's Encrypt the Internet! featuring Kim Dotcom
Western Union now prohibits sending money to the USA from Argentina. Bitcoin may be the only way out...
US advisers urge Trump to refinance US debt by issuing 100-year bonds
Don’t Get Fooled Again — It’s Time to Dump Bonds Now
We need your help to keep working for European digital rights
Xi Jinping says China’s authoritarian system can be a model for the world
Gold Smuggling in India Spikes 446% in Last 12 Months
Startups destroy more jobs than they create – unless they’re tech companies
Ranking the States for Economic and Personal Freedom
The “Dark Side”: Secret Evidence, Illegal Searches, and Dubious Traffic Stops
The SEC Pulled the Plug on Stop-Loss Orders – What You Can Do About It
Sore Loser
The Future of Transportation