
“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
WV teacher threatened with fine for violating Obama school snack rules
Colorado Sheriffs Suing Their Own State Over New Gun Laws
What Forced Separation Feels Like
Jeffrey Tucker on Bitcoin, Digital Anarchy, Socialists, Equality, and More
San Antonio Public School Officials End RFID Tracking Program
Musty Idea: War To Maintain "Credibility" As A Global Hegemon
Visit the Wrong Website, and the FBI Could End Up in Your Computer
Why bitcoins are 60% more expensive in Argentina than the US
A Purse Snatching Led to the Legal Justification for NSA Domestic Spying
Bystander’s YouTube upload shows cops shooting, killing fleeing man
Reality Check: President Obama’s Rules For Assassinating U.S. Citizens?
Edward Snowden’s father: ‘Absolutely no faith’ son would get fair trial in U.S.
Goldman Sachs: Bitcoin Isn’t a Currency But Tech Holds Promise
Congress Uses 'The Troops' to Waste Your Money
Afghan authorities slam NATO after drone strike kills 16 civilians