“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Marketing Genius: Girl Scout Sells Cookies Outside Marijuana Clinic
Glenn Beck calls for celebrating Ramadan by shooting all Guantanamo prisoners in the head
Palantir, LAPD Use Predictive Policing to Monitor Specific People
Perception vs. Experience: Misconceptions about Puerto Rico
Total U.S. Public Debt Now Eclipses GDP
Tennessee: Officer Testimony Beats Hard Evidence in Speeding Case
Tulsa police shoot dead unarmed black man with hands in air
Cop Violently Slams Handcuffed School Girl Into Concrete; No Drugs Found
Anti-cocaine vaccine research edges closer to human trials
Naughty America Joins Porn.com in Bitcoin Acceptance
Can Swiss Human Rights Withstand IRS Extraterritorial Tax Enforcement?
Geithner's Ghost Writer Says He Would Cheer Drone Attack on Julian Assange
Teen arrested for using app to “shoot” his classmates with a cellphone
Petty Law Enforcement vs. the Poor
Reefer Madness… by Executive Order