
“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
The Skinny on Breadth
Global Credit-Card Networks To Collaborate In Policing Legal Gun Purchases
Inside TimeSpace, the New York Times’ new startup accelerator
India's Cash Ban Leaves At Least 47 Dead, So Far
Peter Schiff Explains How The Patriot Act Forces Him To Spy On His Customers
Teen Spends 13 Days in Jail for a Pocketknife in a School Parking Lot
Israel to annex Syrian Golan Heights after 'billion barrel' oil find
5 GMO Myths Busted
Rand Paul slams Obama’s plans for military involvement in Syria
The Most Powerful Bitcoin Miner In The World: KnC Jupiter
Jack Lew to John Boehner: Raise debt ceiling in February
Atlanta Installs Urine Detection System in MARTA Elevators
US officials: New leaker compromised national security after Snowden
FBI and DOJ Target New Enemy In Encryption Wars: Apple and Google
Apple has lost $90 billion in market cap in the last 2 weeks