“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
8-year-old suspended from Florida school for playing cops and robbers
Homeland Security’s Massive New Face Recognition, DNA, and Relationship Database
Drudge Poll: 91% Say “Stay Out of Syria.”
Turkey will not halt Iran gold exports despite sanctions pressure
Amnesty’s Shilling for US Wars
MIT to New Jersey: Back off our students
Want to Defend Your Privacy?
China Officially Backs Russia On Syria, Warns On Global Economy
Cop Removes Body Cam Then Shoots, Kills Unarmed Dad as He Complies
Selfish Mining: A 25% Attack Against the Bitcoin Network
Bitcoin ATM Machines Receive Full Funding Hours After Campaign Launches
Feds 'Rescue' Women From Their Freedom, Money In Sting Operations
Libertarian state senate candidate gets arrested at pro-marijuana rally
On Life Remotely: An Interview with Jessica Mans
Israel Used Soldiers as Guinea Pigs in Untested Anthrax Experiment