“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
The Real Story Behind the 1914 Christmas Truce in World War I
Study: Drugged Driving Laws Have Little Or No Impact On Traffic Deaths
The Anti-Hong Kong: Tanzania Bans Private Statistics
California collects, owns and sells infants' DNA samples
Kidnappers: The Tyranny of Child Protective Services Across the Nation
SEC's Khuzami Uses Revolving Door to Make $5 Million
FATCA Reciprocity Will Now Target Delaware?
More than half the members of Congress are millionaires
Sweden and Norway to add Bitcoin VAT; Norway to implement Bitcoin tax
Bankrupt Philadelphia plunders homeowners via gas monopoly
Bitcoin - The Digital Black Market: Anonymous and Uncensored
Jeffrey Tucker: Must Government Have the Power to Quarantine?
Gary Johnson Issues Statement on Syria
Senate Report Highlights Cars Vulnerable to DARPA-Funded Hackers
ObamaTrade: Total Surrender to the NWO