
“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
Street Libertarians Handle the Police
67 Countries the U.S. Is Obliged to Go to War For
Price Inflation Watch: Average NYC Rent Passes $3,000
Grading the Presidential Candidates on Marijuana Policy
New England Marijuana Legalization Bills Coming
US-led war against ISIS is killing 31 times more civilians than claimed
What Forced Separation Feels Like
Brooklyn pot dealer donates proceeds to hurricane survivors
Who Got the Fed Minutes in Advance of Everyone Else and Why?
Lyn Ulbricht: The Far Reaching Impact of the Silk Road Case
Colorado Makes History with First Legal Retail Marijuana Sales
Georgia’s civil asset forfeiture 'reform' to go into effect
It's Time for a Crypto Bank: The Crypto Finance IPO
Did you call for nuclear genocide against Muslims? Got a lawyer for ya!
DOJ: Drug Traffickers Easily Circumvented TSA For Years