
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Peter Surda Talks About The Economics Of Bitcoin - Deflation
America's New Female Combatants Are Getting Custom Gear
Beginning of the End for the Kirchner Era
How Silicon Valley workers are revolting against ICE overreach
Legal Marijuana: China Competing With U.S. Cannabis Companies?
MSNBC Blames Boston Bombing on “Deeply Racist” Alex Jones
Danish government issues warning against Bitcoin
US and the Chalabi-ization of Syria
Hunt for Silk Road users and Bitcoin fortunes intensifies
Guess Where There Is a Restaurant Boom?
Was World War 2 a "good war?"
The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government
Florida sheriff taunts drug dealers in video resembling ISIS propaganda
Another Reason Obamacare Costs Are Headed Through the Roof
Israeli Bitcoin Company Opens First Vietnamese Bitcoin Exchange