“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Google Folds Wallet Support Into Gmail So You Can Send Money As Attachments
In Stamps We Trust: Paving the Road to Prosperity with Food Stamps
US Congressmen Reintroduce Online Sales Tax Bill
We Finally Won One Against the Police State!
Juan Llanos About Bitcoin Licensing
Rick Perry urges Californians to relocate to Texas
A Bitcoin for Your Thoughts
IOU’s: China Buys Treasury Debt
U.N. Urged to Treat Medical Marijuana As Human Right
‘Rise of the Drones’ Is Mostly a PBS Infomercial for the Military Defense Industry
Wyoming Forced To Return $91K Stolen From Musician With 'Roadside Waiver'
Chris Martenson: Official Gold Numbers Don’t Add Up
“We choose debt. . .”
Colleges attempt to avoid tuition cost scrutiny by piling on student fees
Autonomy of the Federal Reserve Is Praised by Media