
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: Should You Turn Bullish in 2014?
UN investigator: Obama must release details of Bush kidnapping and torture program
Why Bitcoin's Growth is Normal & The S-Curves You Could Never See
Peter Thiel & Founders Fund lead $2m funding round in BitPay
Tax Money: One Man Shot a Million Photos of President George W. Bush
Use of Marijuana Said to Reduce Deaths From Painkillers by 25%
CME Hikes Gold Margins By 25%
HSBC USA Joins Chase in Limiting International Money Transfers
Congressman Ron Paul's Farewell Speech to Congress
Gallup Poll Finds 58% of Americans Support Legalizing Marijuana
Joel Salatin on Knowing Your Farmer: "Link up with the tribe."
Cops Interrogate Family For Allowing Kids To Play Outside
T-Mobile announces unlimited global data roaming at no extra charge
I Bought Bitcoin In Person And Here's What Happened
Singapore’s central bank lost $10.2 billion fighting Bernanke [2013]