
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Polish Finance Official: Bitcoin is Not Illegal
CBP Agents Demand ID Before Allowing Domestic Flyers to Disembark
IRS Agents Rob Convenience Store
Texas begins replacing paved roads with gravel due to lack of funding
Amnesty’s Shilling for US Wars
The Rise of No-Knock SWAT Raids
Zimbabwe Bitcoin Exchange Ban Lifted After Central Bank Fails To Appear
Peter Buffett's Very Public Takedown of His Father, Warren
Cop Arrests Guy For Drinking A Half & Half Arizona Ice Tea
How the NSA Converts Spoken Words Into Searchable Text
Market Volatility Makes a Comeback
IMF Chief Suggests IMFCoin Cryptocurrency as Possibility
Is It Time to Boycott All US Bitcoin Companies?
Oregon: Jesus Malverde Medallion Did Not Justify Traffic Stop
Fed: "Growing concern that college graduates are increasingly underemployed"