
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Overstock Unveils Blockchain Trading Platform at Nasdaq Event
Man Arrested for Video Recording Military Exercise from City-Owned Parking Lot
Facebook Security Director, Amazon BD Director Join Coinbase
Obama Narrows Field for Fed Chairman to 3
First Firearms Retailer In Texas Accepting Bitcoin
Republican governor pushes to restore vote to nonviolent felons in Virginia
Lavabit Founder Ladar Levison, The Rosa Parks of Internet Freedom
Kentucky man sent to prison for altering racist comments on website
Rape and sexual assault run rampant in juvenile justice system: Justice Department survey
“Stomp on Jesus’ Name or Flunk My Class,” Says Professor. Student Refuses. Gone!
Extremely critical crypto flaw in iOS may also affect fully patched Macs
US National Debt Since 1977 By Congressional Composition
It's Not Pretty: The EuroZone Economies
Expats in Spain warned to declare offshore assets
Obama Change.gov Promises Disappear from Web