“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
1 Million Robots To Replace 1 Million Human Jobs At Foxconn? First Robots Have Arrived.
Wall Street Doesn't Understand Bitcoin Yet, But It Will
The secret second OS that makes every mobile phone insecure
Elon Musk reveals Tesla-to-Apple poaching at about 5:1, welcomes 'iCar'
Downgrade the Long-Term Debt of the United States Before It’s Too Late
California collects, owns and sells infants' DNA samples
India mulling further efforts to curb gold imports
Adobe Shockwave bundles Flash that’s 15 mo. behind on security fixes
Three More Cities Vote to Ban Red Light Cameras
Excerpt from Michael Hastings’ “The Operators” Re: Death Threats
The Secret Service Agent Who Collared Cybercrooks by Selling Them Fake IDs
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation To Confiscate Firearms – Gun Owners Get 90 Days To Turn In ...
Most Likely To Secede: The Rise of Nullification
Don’t Leave Home Without This
150 Organizations Condemn Trump's Call for Execution For Drug Offenses