
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Anti-Secession Threat From Spookville
‘Beanie Babies’ creator will pay $53.5 million to IRS for $885,300 delinquency
Uncle Sam Wants Your Keys, Says 'Trust Me'
How a 30-year-old lawyer exposed NSA mass surveillance of Americans—in 1975
War of 1812 and D-Day: the Trump’s team’s twin history gaffes
86 Congressional signers demand an end to the FDA’s ban on gay blood donors
More staged police body cams lead to 43 more dropped Baltimore cases
"Due To Popular Demand" Goldman Starts Covering Bitcoin
NDAA Indefinite Detention Opponents File Supreme Court Emergency Motion
Beating Obamacare: Hospitals Across Borders
DOJ Demands 1.3 Million IP Addresses Of Visitors To Antifa Website
It might cost you $39K to crowdfund $100K under the SEC’s new rules
You Won’t Believe What’s Going On with Government Spying on Americans
2017 Was Safest Year for Cops in Nearly 50 Years—Worst For Citizens
Hollywood studio sees cost-saving benefits of bitcoin